Effect of post-osseointegration loading magnitude on the dynamics of peri-implant bone: a finite element analysis and in vivo study

Matsuzaki, Tatsuya; Ayukawa, Yasunori; Matsushita, Yasuyuki; Sakai, Nobuo; Matsuzaki, Maki; Masuzaki, Tomohiro; Haraguchi, Takuya; Ogino, Yoichiro; Koyano, Kiyoshi

doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2018.10.009

Cited by 14 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the trajectorial theory, the organization of trabecular bone regard as the cornerstone of Wolff's Law, and the pattern and orientation of trabeculae are transformable with alterations in loading pattern, while its patterning represented the average regime experienced by the bone [ 41 ], so we focused on the trabecular peri-implant bone in order to explore its biological features under the stress distribution of tilted implantation. According to the action mode of load transduction, we divided the region of peri-implant bone related to the components of stress to the compressive side and tensile side [ 42 ], Fig. 5 A displayed the selected regions of interest (ROIs) illustration within the peri-implant bone for tilted implantation model.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanobiologically optimized Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr improves load transduction and enhances bone remodeling in tilted dental implant therapy

Mao

Jin

et al. 2022

Bioactive Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanobiologically optimized Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr improves load transduction and enhances bone remodeling in tilted dental implant therapy

Mao

Jin

et al. 2022

Bioactive Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As reported by Duyck, this can fall below the stimulation threshold. Furthermore, these load cycles were applied after the osseointegration, which mimics a delayed loading protocol and not an immediate loading as applied in our study [46][47][48].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bone Buttress Theory: The Effect of the Mechanical Loading of Bone on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants

Chávarri-Prado

Brizuela-Velasco

Álvarez-Arenal

et al. 2020

Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To determine the effect of mechanical loading of bone on the stability and histomorphometric variables of the osseointegration of dental implants using an experimental test in an animal model. Materials and Methods: A total of 4 human implants were placed in both tibiae of 10 New Zealand rabbits (n = 40). A 6-week osseointegration was considered, and the rabbits were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (Test group) included 5 rabbits that ran on a treadmill for 20 min daily during the osseointegration period; Group B (Controls) included the other 5 that were housed conventionally. The monitored variables were related to the primary and secondary stability of the dental implants (implant stability quotient—ISQ), vertical bone growth, bone to implant contact (BIC), area of regenerated bone and the percentage of immature matrix. Results: The results of the study show a greater vertical bone growth (Group A 1.26 ± 0.48 mm, Group B 0.32 ± 0.47 mm, p < 0.001), higher ISQ values (Group A 11.25 ± 6.10 ISQ, 15.73%; Group B 5.80 ± 5.97 ISQ, 7.99%, p = 0.006) and a higher BIC (Group A 19.37%, Group B 23.60%, p = 0.0058) for implants in the test group, with statistically significant differences. A higher percentage of immature bone matrix was observed for implants in the control group (20.68 ± 9.53) than those in the test group (15.38 ± 8.84) (p = 0.108). A larger area of regenerated bone was also observed for the test implants (Group A 280.50 ± 125.40 mm2, Group B 228.00 ± 141.40 mm2), but it was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). Conclusions: The mechanical loading of bone improves the stability and the histomorphometric variables of the osseointegration of dental implants.

show abstract

“…Fourth, the only parameter representing the progress of osseointegration considered herein was the BIC, which is not representative of the evolution of bone quality during healing. Fifth, the exact position of the implant in rabbit bone was not controlled and a bi-cortical fixation may sometimes be obtained, which is usual for the present animal model, which has been used in (38)(39)(40)55). However, obtaining a bi-cortical fixation does not jeopardize the results obtained herein because the aim of this paper was not to assess the evolution of the healing process itself (as it was the case in (38) for instance), but to compare the sensitivity of the QUS and RFA methods on these changes.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of dental implant stability using resonance frequency analysis and quantitative ultrasound methods

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effect of post-osseointegration loading magnitude on the dynamics of peri-implant bone: a finite element analysis and in vivo study

Cited by 14 publications

References 18 publications

Mechanobiologically optimized Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr improves load transduction and enhances bone remodeling in tilted dental implant therapy

Mechanobiologically optimized Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr improves load transduction and enhances bone remodeling in tilted dental implant therapy

The Bone Buttress Theory: The Effect of the Mechanical Loading of Bone on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants

Assessment of dental implant stability using resonance frequency analysis and quantitative ultrasound methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About