2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported the importance of defining the distal border of the ROI in the BMD measurement, because a 1 mm change results in a BMD change of 0.54% to 0.68%. 27,28 Further, the errors in angle measurements to account for the variance in patient positioning during CT were small (Figures 4c and 4d), especially for abduction and flexion, which independently lead to errors in BMD measurements. 29 As the distal border of the ROI was defined based on the tip of the lesser trochanter that had small errors in the landmark detection model (1.9 mm to 2.0 mm) and as hip abduction and flexion were accurately compensated, the CT-aBMD was likely quantified with less error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies have reported the importance of defining the distal border of the ROI in the BMD measurement, because a 1 mm change results in a BMD change of 0.54% to 0.68%. 27,28 Further, the errors in angle measurements to account for the variance in patient positioning during CT were small (Figures 4c and 4d), especially for abduction and flexion, which independently lead to errors in BMD measurements. 29 As the distal border of the ROI was defined based on the tip of the lesser trochanter that had small errors in the landmark detection model (1.9 mm to 2.0 mm) and as hip abduction and flexion were accurately compensated, the CT-aBMD was likely quantified with less error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is important to note that manual efforts are still necessary to quantify BMD from CT images because the bone regions of interest must be selected manually. Because this process is time consuming and prone to error [21], in future studies, we aim to explore developing a convolutional neural network to isolate the region of interest (e.g., femoral neck and spine) to create a fully automated system, which would pave the way for conducting multicenter quantitative CT studies with large datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We limited measurement bias on the BMD scans since all scans were performed by two trained operators with expertise in DXA scans [ 14 ]. Furthermore, all DXA scans were performed on the same machine (HOLOGIC Discovery) [ 15 ], and the two measurements were performed on the same day in each patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%