2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Porosity on free and forced vibration characteristics of the GPL reinforcement composite nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the dimensionless critical loads of the GPLRC nanoshell with both the analytical method and GDQM are studied in Table 4 for different materials. As another verification, Table 5 compares the natural frequencies versus different patterns of the GPL of the simply supported cylindrical nanoshell of the present study with those reported by Pourjabari et al. (2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the dimensionless critical loads of the GPLRC nanoshell with both the analytical method and GDQM are studied in Table 4 for different materials. As another verification, Table 5 compares the natural frequencies versus different patterns of the GPL of the simply supported cylindrical nanoshell of the present study with those reported by Pourjabari et al. (2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…To derive the equations of motion and BCs for the FG cylindrical shell, using NSGT and the FSDT, one must insert the displacement components into the strains. Now, substituting equation (9) into strain equations (Pourjabari et al., 2019), the components of the strain tensor can be extracted as follows …”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As classical theory does not consider submicron discontinuities of structure, so it cannot capture size-dependent effects when scale turns to micro or nano. Size-dependent theories including nonlocal [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], strain gradient [31,32] and couple stress [33][34][35][36][37][38] theories are better choices and present more accurate outputs in these cases. It should be noted that mentioned theories consist of size-dependent parameters which their exact values must be determined by experimental data or numerical simulations [39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the never ending attitude of technology for improving the mechanical properties and operation of the structures, 16 Graphene platelet (GPL) reinforcement gain the attention of scientists for providing an enthusiastic enhancement in design of the applicable composite structures. 7–12 In the field of improving the mechanical properties, enhancing the elastoplastic stability and instability of sheet metal are presented in some researches with the aid of experimental and finite element method. 1,1326 Sun and Zhao 27 compared the fracture behavior of the functionally graded (FG) cemented carbide reinforced with and without the GPL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%