1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1978.tb04188.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of population density and feeding rate on the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

Abstract: Juvenile fathead minnows (Pimephalespromelus) were stocked in tanks at different densities and different ration levels, in two experiments, to determine effects on final population density, growth and fecundity. Length and weight of fish increased with increased food availability. Egg size was exponentially related to growth and perhaps directly to ration level. High population density appeared to limit growth and gamete development regardless of food abundance. Additionally, water volume appeared to limit num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was due to the influence of stocking density in the treatments. In this regard, Smith, Schreck and Maughan (1978) stressed the importance of taking fish density into account when ranking families or progeny groups for growth performance where fish density is an important factor affecting growth and maturation of wild and laboratory fish, besides food supply and its quality, genetics and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to the influence of stocking density in the treatments. In this regard, Smith, Schreck and Maughan (1978) stressed the importance of taking fish density into account when ranking families or progeny groups for growth performance where fish density is an important factor affecting growth and maturation of wild and laboratory fish, besides food supply and its quality, genetics and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such species include salmon (Salmo salar) (Adams et al, 2007;Turnbull et al, 1998Turnbull et al, , 2005, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Ellis et al, 2002), Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) (Brown et al, 1992;Jørgensen et al, 1993) or model species such as zebrafish (Danio rerio) (Gronquist and Berges, 2013;Pavlidis et al, 2013;Spence and Smith, 2005), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) (Ankley and Villeneuve, 2006;Smith et al, 1978), and Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) (Davis et al, 2002;USEPA, 1991). When working experimentally with non-model and/or endangered fish species, data on optimal stocking densities may be limited, and thus important to determine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this may be because of unexplained lower survival in the controls and the lowest β‐sitosterol exposures (55–65%) relative to the higher exposure concentrations (73–85%). At higher densities, fish weights tend to be lower even when fish are fed ad libitum . Weight of larvae hatched from β‐sitosterol–exposed eggs and parent fish at 28 d posthatch was lower than in those hatched from unexposed eggs and parent fish, which is likely a result of the age of the breeding stock used to initiate the test compared with the age of the F 1 parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%