2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of polyol osmolytes on ΔGD, the Gibbs energy of stabilisation of proteins at different pH values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, under extremely high alkaline conditions (beyond pH 12) the solubility decreased notably. This could be a result of significant protein denaturation and clustering, rendering the proteins insoluble (Haque et al, 2005). The variation in protein recovery was only about 10% in the entire pH range of 6-12, although the trend was irregular.…”
Section: Protein Solubility Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under extremely high alkaline conditions (beyond pH 12) the solubility decreased notably. This could be a result of significant protein denaturation and clustering, rendering the proteins insoluble (Haque et al, 2005). The variation in protein recovery was only about 10% in the entire pH range of 6-12, although the trend was irregular.…”
Section: Protein Solubility Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on thermodynamics parameters have also shown that while polyols could increase the Tm of model proteins in direct relationship with their concentrations, they manifest an effect on the Gibbs energy of stabilization of proteins at lower pHs (with no effect at neutral pH) against thermal denaturation [93,94]. Individually, polyols have also been studied with regard to their specific effect on proteins, sometimes with various effects.…”
Section: Polyolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DG D -value thus obtained has a large error, which increases with an increase in T m (the midpoint of thermal denaturation) caused by the presence of compatible osmolytes. For instance, if values of T m (midpoint of denaturation), DH m (enthalpy change at T m ) and DC p (constant pressure -heat capacity change) are 86.5 -C, 564.0 T 40 kJ mol À 1 and 6.77 T 0.54 kJ mol À 1 K À 1 [9], respectively, the DG D -is estimated with an error of 17% (DG D -= 58.62 T 9.86 kJ mol À 1 ) and this error increases with the rise in T m due to the presence of osmolyte. These considerations cast doubt on our earlier conclusions regarding the effect of polyols on DG D -of proteins [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if values of T m (midpoint of denaturation), DH m (enthalpy change at T m ) and DC p (constant pressure -heat capacity change) are 86.5 -C, 564.0 T 40 kJ mol À 1 and 6.77 T 0.54 kJ mol À 1 K À 1 [9], respectively, the DG D -is estimated with an error of 17% (DG D -= 58.62 T 9.86 kJ mol À 1 ) and this error increases with the rise in T m due to the presence of osmolyte. These considerations cast doubt on our earlier conclusions regarding the effect of polyols on DG D -of proteins [9]. We thought it would be worthwhile to measure DG D -of lysozyme and ribonuclease-A (RNase-A) using a more accurate method, i.e., from the guanidinium chloride (GdmCl)-induced denaturation at 25 -C and under the solvent conditions (polyols and pH values) used in thermal denaturation studies of these proteins [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation