2022
DOI: 10.1177/00031348221124320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Plastic Bag Extraction in Minimally Invasive Appendectomy

Abstract: Background Evidence regarding the effects of plastic bag use for appendix removal during minimally invasive appendectomy remains scarce and conflicting. Objective This study aimed to analyze the effects of plastic bag use during minimally invasive appendectomy on preoperative infection risk, morbidity and mortality. Design This retrospective analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) cohort program. Setting This study included data from the NSQIP database between the year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of all-cause morbidity included any episode of return to the operating room, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, acute renal failure, cardiac arrest, urinary tract infection, wound disruption, pulmonary embolism, progression of renal failure and postoperative sepsis. This all-cause morbidity cohort has already been validated in previous studies [11,12] using data from the NSQIP and was included in our statistical analysis programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of all-cause morbidity included any episode of return to the operating room, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, acute renal failure, cardiac arrest, urinary tract infection, wound disruption, pulmonary embolism, progression of renal failure and postoperative sepsis. This all-cause morbidity cohort has already been validated in previous studies [11,12] using data from the NSQIP and was included in our statistical analysis programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%