Abstract:A field experiment was conducted in a wet season (Kharif) to study the effects of plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria(PGPR) inoculation on agronomic traits and productivity of Basmati rice (cv. 'Pusa Basmati 1401') in a randomized block with twelve treatments. We evaluated one bacterial (Providencia sp. PW5) and one cyanobacterial strain (Anabaena sp. CR3), and also a Multani mitti (Fuller's earth)-based blue-green algal biofertilizer (a composite culture of Anabaena, Nostoc, Tolypothrix and Aulosira sp.). Pla… Show more
“…The balanced and adequate nutrient supply favoured better crop growth which ultimately increased the yield. Similar findings were reported by Singh et al (2008) and Meena et al (2014). Harvest index (HI) was significantly influenced by planting methods but nutrient management options had no significant effect on HI.…”
A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2017–18 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi to study the effect of crop establishment methods and nutrient management options on and energetics of rice (Oryza sativa L) (cv. Pusa Basmati 1509). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised two main plots, viz. aerobic rice (AR) and conventional transplanted (CT) rice and three sub-plots, viz. 100 % RDF (120:60:60 kg N: P2O5: K2O); 100 % RDF + biofertilizers (bf) and 125 % RDF. Results showed that plant growth and yield were significantly superior in CT rice than AR. In case of nutrient management, application of 125% RDF gave significantly higher grain (4.76 and 5.17 t/ha) and biological yields (11.77 and 12.55 t/ha) and those were at par with 100% RDF + bf. Likewise, significantly higher energy input (25.19 and 25.15 ×103 MJ/ha), output (158.85 and 168.62×103 MJ /ha) was recorded in CT than AR and net energy obtained was non-significant. Among nutrient management options, significantly higher energy input were consumed in 125% RDF followed by 100% RDF +bf and 100% RDF and the energy output was also higher with 125% RDF and 100 % RDF + bf. Hence, CT rice along with 100% RDF + biofertilizers may be recommended for farmers to get higher productivity, profitability and energy values. But in case of water scarce conditions, aerobic rice can be recommended with 100% RDF+ biofertilizers with slight penalty in grain yield and net returns.
“…The balanced and adequate nutrient supply favoured better crop growth which ultimately increased the yield. Similar findings were reported by Singh et al (2008) and Meena et al (2014). Harvest index (HI) was significantly influenced by planting methods but nutrient management options had no significant effect on HI.…”
A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2017–18 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi to study the effect of crop establishment methods and nutrient management options on and energetics of rice (Oryza sativa L) (cv. Pusa Basmati 1509). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised two main plots, viz. aerobic rice (AR) and conventional transplanted (CT) rice and three sub-plots, viz. 100 % RDF (120:60:60 kg N: P2O5: K2O); 100 % RDF + biofertilizers (bf) and 125 % RDF. Results showed that plant growth and yield were significantly superior in CT rice than AR. In case of nutrient management, application of 125% RDF gave significantly higher grain (4.76 and 5.17 t/ha) and biological yields (11.77 and 12.55 t/ha) and those were at par with 100% RDF + bf. Likewise, significantly higher energy input (25.19 and 25.15 ×103 MJ/ha), output (158.85 and 168.62×103 MJ /ha) was recorded in CT than AR and net energy obtained was non-significant. Among nutrient management options, significantly higher energy input were consumed in 125% RDF followed by 100% RDF +bf and 100% RDF and the energy output was also higher with 125% RDF and 100 % RDF + bf. Hence, CT rice along with 100% RDF + biofertilizers may be recommended for farmers to get higher productivity, profitability and energy values. But in case of water scarce conditions, aerobic rice can be recommended with 100% RDF+ biofertilizers with slight penalty in grain yield and net returns.
“…11,17,2 Better nutrition ultimately leads to luxurious root growth to extract nutrients and moisture more efficiency from deeper soil layer resulting better growth and development of plants, more leaf area and greater dry matter accumulation. 12,3,21 22,30,9,1 Interaction effect of variety and phosphorus levels was found significant with respect to shelling percent and 100-kernel weight (Table 3). In Kormaki variety maximum 100-kernel weight was recorded with 60 kg P2O5 ha -1 , whereas, greatest 100kernel weight of Paparri variety was found with 80 kg P2O5 ha -1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The groundnut protein consists of two type's proteins, namely, arachin and conarachin. 26 Amino Acid analysis shown that the main amino acid was glutamic acid (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) %, arginine (11-13%), aspartic acid (8-13%). 15 Groundnut is cultivated worldwide in tropical, subtropical and warm temperature regions between 40⁰ N and 40⁰ S latitude.…”
Farm of Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences and Technology University (ANASTU), Kandahar, Afghanistan to find out most suitable groundnut variety and their phosphorus levels in the study region. The treatments combination was of two groundnut varieties (Kormaki and Paparri) and four levels of phosphorus as P2O5 (P0= 0 kg P2O5 ha-1, P1=40 kg P2O5 ha-1, P2= 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and P3= 80 kg P2O5 ha-1), were tested in a split plot design. Result revealed that Paparri variety produced significantly higher growth attributes (plant height, dry matter accumulation and number of main branches plant-1) and yield attributes (number of pods plant-1, pods dry weight plant-1, 100 kernel weight and shelling percentage) over Kormaki variety. Likwise, paparri variety produced significantly higher pods yield, kernel yield, haulm yield and biological yield over kormaki variety. In the like manner, significantly higher gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio was recorded from Paparri variety, whereas residual nitrogen was found significantly higher in kormaki variety. Among phosphorus levels, 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 recorded higher values for growth parameters, yield attributes viz. number of pods plant-1, pods weight plant-1, 100 kernel weight and shelling percentage, and yields (including pods yield, kernel yield, haulm yield and biological yield).
“…Despite being most abundantly available element in atmosphere (* 78% by volume), nitrogen (N) continues to be the most growth limiting nutrient element and need to be given prime attention for better crop production [2,48]. The atmospheric N 2 cannot be taken up by plants unless it has been converted into plant utilizable forms either biologically by a process called biological N 2 fixation or artificially in the forms of chemical fertilizers.…”
Section: Nitrogen Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adesemoye et al [2] reported that, with the application of PGPR and mycorrhizal fungi, the recommended dose of fertilizer could be reduced up to 70% without significant reduction in tomato yield. Meena et al [48] observed that the application of PGPR consortia (consisting of bacterial and cyanobacterial inoculations and compost) and 2/3 rd of the recommended dose of N (* 80 kg/ha) led to significant increase in rice grain yield by 90% and 4.5% compared with no N and full dose of N application, respectively. Rice inoculated with PGPR showed stimulation effect on nitrogenase enzyme and hence induced N fixation by blue-green algae [73].…”
Soil micro-organisms play a pivotal role in food production through their significant effects on nutrient transformation and release, soil organic matter and carbon dynamics, and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance to plants. The microbial consortia (MC) are mixtures of two or more microbial species/strains, living together symbiotically. Generally, a consortium of micro-organisms performs better than the inoculum of single microbial species. The MC, specifically plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and biofilm biofertilizers can be used in non-legume cereal crops grown in a large area of the world. The MC may help in solubilization of plant nutrients from the soil native pool, production of beneficial substances (siderophores, hormones, etc.) for better root growth of non-legume crops and reduction in plant growth retarding hormone(s). The MC research focuses/encompasses, mainly legume crops, although there are prospect and substantial evidences of their use in non-legume crops. Reports indicate that the use of MC can enhance micronutrients, total organic carbon and N in soil. They could fix N, solubilize P and K, improve soil physico-chemical properties and act as phyto-stimulator. Globally, almost 50% of the total N, P and K used in crops are consumed by cereal crops, which are heavy feeder with high yield potential. Integration of MC with chemical fertilizers provides enormous scope for increasing nutrient-use efficiency in accordance with harmonious improvement in crop yield and soil health. The MC as a component of integrated nutrient management in non-legume cereal crops would considerably reduce the demand and use of mineral fertilizers and cost of cultivation and save nutrient for use in other crops of economic importance. They are low-cost and eco-friendly options and can improve soil health vis-a-vis enhancing productivity of non-legume crops.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.