2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pier shape and pier alignment on the equilibrium scour depth at single piers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some Researchers used shape factor to relate the scour around different type of piers. Shape factor 1.2 was reported by Cristina Fael [8] for square nosed bridge pier shape while shape factor 1.11 was suggested by Al-Shukur [11] in current study it was found to be 1.10-1.15 relative to scour around circular pier.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some Researchers used shape factor to relate the scour around different type of piers. Shape factor 1.2 was reported by Cristina Fael [8] for square nosed bridge pier shape while shape factor 1.11 was suggested by Al-Shukur [11] in current study it was found to be 1.10-1.15 relative to scour around circular pier.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Franzetti [7] did not agree with this concept. Critiana and Lanea [8] concluded that scour also depends upon shape and alignment of pier with flow direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key factor widely acknowledged as increasing the scour risk of bridges is pier shape. Pier shape plays a vital role in the formation and the strength of the vortex system [7,[9][10][11][12][13]. The shape of the pier embedded vertically at the riverbed greatly changes the flow structures, and one can expect the large variations in the flow field due to different shapes of piers, and hence different scour forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flood modeling involves multiple key aspects including: (i) hydrological model or flood wave characteristics [29], (ii) fluvial geomorphology issues [32][33][34], (iii) the influence of infrastructures such as bridges, dams, or buildings [22,35,36], (iv) structure of hydraulic model, its equations, methods to solve them, and simplifications applied to the model [11,23,37], (v) flow propagation methods [3,38], (vi) human-induced changes in land use [21], (vii) the roughness coefficient [11,31], (viii) vulnerability/damage curves of the potential effects of the flow [22,39,40], and (viii) topographic data of flood prone areas [3,33,[41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%