1963
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0421346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Photoperiod on the Response of Developing Pullets to Different Nutritional Treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

1964
1964
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that a rearing period day-length of less than 9 hours, at a critical time in the rearing period, may result in a reduction in subsequent egg size. These results agree with reports by Siegel et al (1963), Bowman et al (1964), Berg et al (1963) and Lillie and Denton (1965) who reported that day-length declining to 6 to 8 hours or maintained on a constant 6-to 8-hour length resulted in a mean egg size reduction compared with a longer day-length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that a rearing period day-length of less than 9 hours, at a critical time in the rearing period, may result in a reduction in subsequent egg size. These results agree with reports by Siegel et al (1963), Bowman et al (1964), Berg et al (1963) and Lillie and Denton (1965) who reported that day-length declining to 6 to 8 hours or maintained on a constant 6-to 8-hour length resulted in a mean egg size reduction compared with a longer day-length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…These results are contrary to reports by McClary (1964), and Morris et al (1964) which suggest that a "step-down, step-up" light treatment is superior to other treatments, but Berg et al (1963) and Lillie and Denton (1965) reported that a constant 14-to 16-hour day-length resulted in equivalent egg production compared with other light treatments which supports results reported here. Smith and Noles (1963), Lowe and Heywang (1964), and Noles and Smith (1964) worked with a wide variety of light treatments which included a 14-to 16-hour laying period day-length but failed to demonstrate a marked advantage for one treat-ment over another.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…On average this advantage proved to be 6-7 eggs per bird and was highly significant. Data for terminal rate of lay were supplied by Gowe et al (i960), for the last 5 d of production; Bullock (1962), for the last 14 d; Berg, Hansen and Bearse (1963), for the last 28 d and Strain et al (1965), for the last 14 d. In only 2 cases out of the 33 comparisons was production lower at this stage from restricted-fed as opposed to fully fed pullets (see Table 3, consideration D).…”
Section: Postulate Ofmodelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.-Illustration of relationship between level of food restriction during rearing period and days delayin sexual maturity. Data from: Ashcroft (1961), Berg and Bearse (1961), Berg et al (1963), Blount (i960), Bruckner and Hill (1959), Bullock et al (1963), Deaton and Quisenberry (1963), Fuller (1962), Fuller and Dunahoo (1962), Gardiner and Maclntyre (1962), Gowe et al (i960), Hollands and Gowe (1961), Isaacks et al (1960), Lillie and Denton (1966), Maclntyre and Aitken (1959), Maclntyre and Gardiner (1964), Milby and Sherwood (1956), Proudfoot and Gowe (1967), Ringrose (1958), Schneider et al (1955), Strain et al (1965), Tomhave (1958), Vondell (1943) and Walter and Aitken (1961). delay in maturity.…”
Section: Quantitative Food Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation