2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-016-3856-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Phase Contiguity and Morphology on the Evolution of Deformation Texture in Two-Phase Alloys

Abstract: Deformation texture evolution in two-phase xFe-yNi-(100-x-y)Cr model alloys and Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy was studied during rolling to develop an understanding of micro-mechanisms of deformation in industrially relevant two-phase FCC-BCC steels and HCP-BCC titanium alloys, respectively. It was found that volume fraction and contiguity of phases lead to systematic changes in texture, while morphology affects the strength of texture. There was a characteristic change in texture from typical Brass-type to a weaker Copp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the as-received microstructure, the c-axis of α phase are about 40°to the rolling direction and 50°t o the normal direction, and the β phase exhibits an approximate {001} < 100 > texture component, Figure 8a. After annealing, the main features of the textures of both α and β phases are completely different with that in as-received microstructure, Figure 8b-e. For α phase, a peculiarity of (0001) basal texture that nearly all c-axes are parallel to the normal direction is exhibited in the early annealing stages (1 h), Figure 8b, which is consistent with the typical rolling texture [30]. After annealing for 2 h, the (0001) basal texture in α phase weakens, Figure 8c.…”
Section: Texture Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the as-received microstructure, the c-axis of α phase are about 40°to the rolling direction and 50°t o the normal direction, and the β phase exhibits an approximate {001} < 100 > texture component, Figure 8a. After annealing, the main features of the textures of both α and β phases are completely different with that in as-received microstructure, Figure 8b-e. For α phase, a peculiarity of (0001) basal texture that nearly all c-axes are parallel to the normal direction is exhibited in the early annealing stages (1 h), Figure 8b, which is consistent with the typical rolling texture [30]. After annealing for 2 h, the (0001) basal texture in α phase weakens, Figure 8c.…”
Section: Texture Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Some believe that there is no effect of one phase on the evolution of texture in the other phase, while others believe that there is a significant effect due to presence of interface, which can affect the dislocation motion and, consequently, grain rotations. [23,24,62] The basis for the former belief is Taylor simulations considering ferrite separately, which produced a good match with the experimental ferrite texture. During cold rolling, grains fragment and tend to rotate to their stable end orientations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Grain boundary misorientation maps on ECAP and after post-ECAP annealing from 473 -1373 K are represented in Figure 1. High angle grain boundaries (HAGB) fraction on ECAP processed microstructure is predominant with a little fraction of low angle grain boundary (LAGB) [19]. Because of low orientation resolution, boundaries with misorientation smaller than 2 was omitted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%