2020
DOI: 10.3390/membranes10090235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH on Total Volume Membrane Charge Density in the Nanofiltration of Aqueous Solutions of Nitrate Salts of Heavy Metals

Abstract: The separation efficiencies of aqueous solutions containing nitric salts of Zn, Cu, Fe or Pb at various pH in process of nanofiltration have been investigated experimentally. These results were used to obtain the total volume membrane charge densities, through mathematical modelling based on the Donnan–Steric partitioning Model. The experimentally obtained retention values of individual heavy metal ions varied between 36% (Zn2+ at pH = 2), 57% (Pb2+ at pH = 2), 80% (Fe3+ at pH = 9), and up to 97% (Cu2+ at pH =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rejection of Cu(II) ions started to increase with the increase in feed concentration from 60 ppm to 100 ppm at constant pressure (1.5 bar) and pH value (pH 5), as shown in Figure 3a, and these conditions might be due to the changes in the membrane density, as reported by other researchers [52]. To date, it is believed that the membrane charge density is influenced by the bulk ion concentrations, in which membrane charge density increases with the electrolyte concentrations [53][54][55][56]. This phenomenon was caused by the selective and additional ions adsorption on the membrane surface or in the pore wall.…”
Section: Effect Of Cu(ii) Ions Feed Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rejection of Cu(II) ions started to increase with the increase in feed concentration from 60 ppm to 100 ppm at constant pressure (1.5 bar) and pH value (pH 5), as shown in Figure 3a, and these conditions might be due to the changes in the membrane density, as reported by other researchers [52]. To date, it is believed that the membrane charge density is influenced by the bulk ion concentrations, in which membrane charge density increases with the electrolyte concentrations [53][54][55][56]. This phenomenon was caused by the selective and additional ions adsorption on the membrane surface or in the pore wall.…”
Section: Effect Of Cu(ii) Ions Feed Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This phenomenon was caused by the selective and additional ions adsorption on the membrane surface or in the pore wall. Here, the first stage involved the complexation formation, followed by the adsorption of the additional ions, thus influencing the membrane charge [55,57,58]. Such behavior is schematically illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Effect Of Cu(ii) Ions Feed Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the solution pH is higher than the membrane isoelectric point (IEP), the membrane surface charge increases with pH and reaches a plateau value at pH of about 7-8. This was demonstrated by the measurement of the membrane zeta potential [12,13], as well as by mathematical modeling [14]. Thus, an effective pK a value can be estimated for the membrane, that is, the average pK a value of all the functional groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Conceptual diagram of the conventional membrane technologies applied to desalination (Mentioned references[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%