2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH on the synthesis of CuO films by SILAR method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SILAR-fabricated CuO films were also fabricated from precursor solutions of varying pH (9, 9.5, and 10) and the changes in the physical properties of films were assessed. [57] In terms of crystallinity, samples show a general trend of increasing crystallinity with decreasing pH, even if the range investigated in this study is rather narrow. The crystallite size increased drastically in samples prepared at the lowest pH, which was also accompanied by a slight reduction in bandgap energy, and a sharper band edge.…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SILAR-fabricated CuO films were also fabricated from precursor solutions of varying pH (9, 9.5, and 10) and the changes in the physical properties of films were assessed. [57] In terms of crystallinity, samples show a general trend of increasing crystallinity with decreasing pH, even if the range investigated in this study is rather narrow. The crystallite size increased drastically in samples prepared at the lowest pH, which was also accompanied by a slight reduction in bandgap energy, and a sharper band edge.…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Laukaitis et al pinpointed the reason of variation in the residual stress level after reaching optimum thickness to a transition from a 2D to a 3D growth. [54] Factors such as solution concentrations, [55,56] the pH of ionic solutions, [57] pH of rinsing solutions, solution temperatures and residence times in solutions [58] have been shown to directly affect the properties of the resultant thin films. [44,59] Therefore, the optimal deposition parameters should be determined for each system in relation to the materials and solvents adopted.…”
Section: Fundamentals and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases a proper formation of lms cannot be achieved. In this regard, various literature studies reported different synthesis parameters with respect to pH values in the formation of CuO thin lms by SILAR method: Yüksel et al [19], Daoudi et al [20] and Mageshwari et al [21] have adjusted the pH value at about 11.0 while Bayansal et al [22], Gençyılmaz et al [23] and Dinc et al [24] have reported a proper synthesis of CuO lms at pH = 10.0, pH = 9.0 and pH = 5.4, respectively. In this work, pH = 10.8, 11.0, 11.2 and 11.4 were attempted in the synthesis of CuO thin lms and a proper CuO layer formation was achieved at all attempted pH values.…”
Section: Role Of Ph In the Chemical Synthesis Of Zno/cuo Heterostruct...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se añadió gota a gota NH 4 OH (28 %) a una solución hasta pH 9.5 con la formación del complejo de amoníaco de cobre [Cu(NH 3 ) 4 ] 2+ . Los sustratos se sumergieron en el complejo [Cu(NH 3 ) 4 ] 2+ durante 20 s. Luego se sumergieron en 100 mL de agua destilada calentada a 85-90 • C durante 20 s. Se forma una capa de Cu(OH) 2 como resultado de la reacción de los iones OH − con los iones Cu 2+ adsorbidos en el sustrato [25]. Esto completa un ciclo SILAR de formación de película de Cu(OH) 2 .…”
Section: Experimental Preparación De Película Fina De Cuo Y Caracterización De Microestructurasunclassified