2007
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.30.667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH on 1H-NMR Spectroscopy of Mouse Urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rat urine typically covered a pH range from 5.5 to 8.5 (mean ± SD was 6.8 ± 1.1) depending on the time of day and on the metabolic status of the animal, and can reach extreme values after treatment of rats with different pharmaceuticals between pH 4.0 and 9.1 (Supplement Figure 2). Similar ranges were also described for mice, covering an even slightly broader range from 3 to 9 [3], which is supported by own unpublished data showing a pH range in mice from 3.9 to 7.8, with a mean ± SD of 7.2 ± 0.7 ( n = 32) for NMRI mice and of 5.4 ± 0.7 ( n = 77) for a different breed, showing in addition breed-specific normal ranges. In men, including healthy volunteers and patients with different treatments and for different illnesses, we found a pH range from 3.0 to 8.7 with a mean ± SD of 5.1 ± 1.3 ( n = 265 samples) in treated patients and of 5.0 ± 1.2 in healthy volunteers ( n = 104 samples).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rat urine typically covered a pH range from 5.5 to 8.5 (mean ± SD was 6.8 ± 1.1) depending on the time of day and on the metabolic status of the animal, and can reach extreme values after treatment of rats with different pharmaceuticals between pH 4.0 and 9.1 (Supplement Figure 2). Similar ranges were also described for mice, covering an even slightly broader range from 3 to 9 [3], which is supported by own unpublished data showing a pH range in mice from 3.9 to 7.8, with a mean ± SD of 7.2 ± 0.7 ( n = 32) for NMRI mice and of 5.4 ± 0.7 ( n = 77) for a different breed, showing in addition breed-specific normal ranges. In men, including healthy volunteers and patients with different treatments and for different illnesses, we found a pH range from 3.0 to 8.7 with a mean ± SD of 5.1 ± 1.3 ( n = 265 samples) in treated patients and of 5.0 ± 1.2 in healthy volunteers ( n = 104 samples).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…If changes in these parameters are not taken into account during sample preparation, they may affect the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of a single metabolite. Only relatively few recommendations for sample collection, preparation, and storage have been published, especially on stabilization of the pH, which is the most important parameter in 1 H NMR spectroscopy [13]. Other studies give recommendations for buffer compositions to stabilize plasma [4], bile, and urine samples [1] or urine samples only [11], or for the maximum time for storing samples at 4°C [2, 5] or room temperature (RT) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[66] Miyataka et al, however, saw similar increases in TMA while studying effects of pH on mouse urine and ascribed it to the aging of the mice rather than to the effects of administering a drug. [67] Therefore, it is likely that the overall increase in TMA in antibiotic-treated mice is not directly associated with reduction of microbial flora, but rather due to aging over the course of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other measurement and processing details were performed as described previously (3). As the addition of acidic substances may cause changes in pH and, consequently, chemical shifts, sample pH was assessed using the citrate signal at 2.62 ppm in the 1D spectra (8). Mean and standard deviation of the calculated pH were 7.13 0.01, indicating minimal changes in chemical shift.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%