2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.1557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH and organic ligands on the kinetics of smectite dissolution at 25°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
57
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
12
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermodynamic modeling demonstrates that the presence of carbonate is essential to buffer the pH, allowing Fe-rich montmorillonite to precipitate. This result is consistent with experimental studies on smectite dissolution rates as a function of pH (Bauer and Berger, 1998, Golubev et al 2006and Rozalén et al, 2008. These authors showed that dissolution of smectite at 25°C occurs preferentially at pH < 6, indicating that smectites are more stable in neutral solutions.…”
Section: Conditions Of Iron-rich Montmorillonite Formationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The thermodynamic modeling demonstrates that the presence of carbonate is essential to buffer the pH, allowing Fe-rich montmorillonite to precipitate. This result is consistent with experimental studies on smectite dissolution rates as a function of pH (Bauer and Berger, 1998, Golubev et al 2006and Rozalén et al, 2008. These authors showed that dissolution of smectite at 25°C occurs preferentially at pH < 6, indicating that smectites are more stable in neutral solutions.…”
Section: Conditions Of Iron-rich Montmorillonite Formationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Comparison among the other examined ligands indicates that the effectiveness of organic ligands such as oxalate and succinate having two functional groups is higher on the dissolution process as compared to that of the monofunctional organic ligands (formate, acetate, propionate, lactate and butyrate). This result is in agreement with the previously reported data that propose compounds with higher functional groups promote dissolution to a much higher extent than monofunctional ligands (Golubev et al, 2006;Stumm, 1997). Over the experimental period, the the ligands are titrated in the solution reaching the concentration indicated in 5 th column of table 3.2 at 60h.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Organic acids may also chelate with formerly organic-bound surface cations (Golubev et al 2006;Wang et al 2014;Kleber et al 2015) or compete with binding sites and directly displace MAOM via ligand exchange (Oburger et al 2009;Keiluweit et al 2015). These processes can affect both metal oxides and silicate clays, although the potential for MAOM destabilization through this mechanism is generally greater among the former (Golubev et al 2006).…”
Section: Direct Destabilization Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%