Effect of petrolatum coating on fast-absorbing gut suture

Susong, Jason; Neiner, James

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.04.041

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Preprint1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Fast absorbing gut sutures in dermatologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Seger,

McClure,

Neill

et al. 2024

Arch Dermatol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fast absorbing gut sutures in dermatologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Seger,

McClure,

Neill

et al. 2024

Arch Dermatol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Commentary on: Hymen Restoration: An Experience From a Moroccan Center

Sasson

Placik

2021

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fast Absorbing Gut Sutures in Dermatologic Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Seger,

McClure,

Neill

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Fast gut cutaneous sutures have become more prominent due to their low tissue reactivity, rapid absorption, and elimination of suture removal visits. It is not known how fast gut sutures compare to other closure modalities. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing fast gut sutures to alternative closure methods during dermatologic surgery. Data collected included patient and physician assessed cosmetic outcome as well as standardized complication rates. Results Six studies were included in final analysis and reported on 208 patients. Fast gut sutures were associated with lower physician opinions of final scar when compared to polyproline sutures (SMD 0.438; 95% CI: 0.082–0.794). No differences existed between physician opinion of fast gut sutures and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (SMD − 0.024; 95% CI: -0.605–0.556). Complications with fast gut suture placement were rare, and included infection, dehiscence, and hematomas. Fast gut sutures were less likely to experience wound dehiscence than tissue adhesive (p = 0.01). Conclusion If no contraindications to non-absorbable sutures exist, they may provide superior cosmetic outcomes compared to fast gut sutures. Further research is required to better quantify cosmetic outcomes and optimal use of fast gut sutures.

show abstract

Effect of petrolatum coating on fast-absorbing gut suture

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Fast absorbing gut sutures in dermatologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fast absorbing gut sutures in dermatologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Commentary on: Hymen Restoration: An Experience From a Moroccan Center

Fast Absorbing Gut Sutures in Dermatologic Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About