2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03311-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of PEEP decremental on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, pulmonary regional ventilation and hemodynamics in patients with SARS-Cov-2 associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
12
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(29-34), the model provides a heterogeneous disease profile distributed across 100 gas-exchanging compartments implementing (a) vasodilation leading to hyperperfusion of collapsed lung regions, (b) disruption of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, with hypoperfusion of normally aerated lung regions (c) disruption of alveolar gas-exchange due to the effects of pneumonitis, and (d) heightened vascular resistance due to the presence of microthrombi, while maintaining relatively well preserved lung compliance and gas volumes. It replicates closely the levels of ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxemia (34, 35), as well as the lack of responsiveness to PEEP (36-38), that has been documented in some patients with COVID-19; see (28) and the supplementary file for full details.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…(29-34), the model provides a heterogeneous disease profile distributed across 100 gas-exchanging compartments implementing (a) vasodilation leading to hyperperfusion of collapsed lung regions, (b) disruption of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, with hypoperfusion of normally aerated lung regions (c) disruption of alveolar gas-exchange due to the effects of pneumonitis, and (d) heightened vascular resistance due to the presence of microthrombi, while maintaining relatively well preserved lung compliance and gas volumes. It replicates closely the levels of ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxemia (34, 35), as well as the lack of responsiveness to PEEP (36-38), that has been documented in some patients with COVID-19; see (28) and the supplementary file for full details.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…All the changes requested are implemented in this correction, and the original article [1] has been corrected.…”
Section: The Acknowledgments Section Should Readmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correct author group with affiliations should read: Vincent Bonny 1* , Vincent Janiak 2,3 , Savino Spadaro 4,5 , Andrea Pinna 2 , Alexandre Demoule 1,6 and Martin Dres 1,6 1 Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, The sentence currently reads: PEEP decremental was not associated with significant changes in gasses exchanges but was associated with a significant decrease in plateau pressure and driving pressure and with a significant decrease in end-inspiratory and in end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with COVID-19 viral pneumonia, before the secondary endothelial alveolar injury, have the same response to PEEP that focal-ARDS. A high PEEP value, may provoke deleterious effects, so that the harm derived on the lung exceed the benefit [4] . Setting PEEP according to PaO2/FiO2 is questionnable when the disease is related to a viral pneumonia associated with a diffuse endotheliopathy and thrombosis, two phenomenon that may explain deep hypoxemia with sub-normal lung mechanics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%