Effect of pedometer-based walking interventions on long-term health outcomes: Prospective 4-year follow-up of two randomised controlled trials using routine primary care data

Abstract

Background Data are lacking from physical activity (PA) trials with long-term follow-up of both objectively measured PA levels and robust health outcomes. Two primary care 12-week pedometer-based walking interventions in adults and older adults (PACE-UP and PACE-Lift) found sustained objectively measured PA increases at 3 and 4 years, respectively. We aimed to evaluate trial intervention effects on long-term health outcomes relevant to walking interventions, using routine primary care data. Methods and findings Randomisation was from October 2012 to November 2013 for PACE-UP participants from seven general (family) practices and October 2011 to October 2012 for PACE-Lift participants from three practices. We downloaded primary care data, masked to intervention or control status, for 1,001 PACE-UP participants aged 45–75 years, 36% (361) male, and 296 PACE-Lift participants, aged 60–75 years, 46% (138) male, who gave written informed consent, for 4-year periods following randomisation. The following new events were counted for all participants, including those with preexisting diseases (apart from diabetes, for which existing cases were excluded): nonfatal cardiovascular, total cardiovascular (including fatal), incident diabetes, depression, fractures, and falls. Intervention effects on time to first event post-randomisation were modelled using Cox regression for all outcomes, except for falls, which used negative binomial regression to allow for multiple events, adjusting for age, sex, and study. Absolute risk reductions (ARRs) and numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were estimated. Data were downloaded for 1,297 (98%) of 1,321 trial participants. Event rates were low (<20 per group) for outcomes, apart from fractures and falls. Cox hazard ratios for time to first event post-randomisation for interventions versus controls were nonfatal cardiovascular 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.77, p = 0.02), total cardiovascular 0.34 (95% CI 0.12–0.91, p = 0.03), diabetes 0.75 (95% CI 0.42–1.36, p = 0.34), depression 0.98 (95% CI 0.46–2.07, p = 0.96), and fractures 0.56 (95% CI 0.35–0.90, p = 0.02). Negative binomial incident rate ratio for falls was 1.07 (95% CI 0.78–1.46, p = 0.67). ARR and NNT for cardiovascular events were nonfatal 1.7% (95% CI 0.5%–2.1%), NNT = 59 (95% CI 48–194); total 1.6% (95% CI 0.2%–2.2%), NNT = 61 (95% CI 46–472); and for fractures 3.6% (95% CI 0.8%–5.4%), NNT = 28 (95% CI 19–125). Main limitations were that event rates were low and only events recorded in primary care records were counted; however, any underrecording would not have differed by intervention status and so should not have led to bias. Conclusions Routine primary care data used to assess long-term trial outcomes demonstrated significantly fewer new cardiovascular events and fractures in interve...

The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults

“…This has been further corroborated by a recent large population-based cohort study, which has highlighted that engaging in leisure time aerobic activity and meeting national PA guidelines reduces all-cause and cause-specific mortality [ 105 ]. Observational studies such as those above [ 100 – 105 ] are problematic however, in terms of potential reverse causality; so findings from two recent pedometer-based RCTs that demonstrated significant effects on clinical outcomes, with reductions in both cardiovascular events and fractures for an approximate increase of 400–600 steps per day 3–4 years post-intervention, provide reassuring support for these findings [ 92 ].…”

“…Moreover, we were confident that due to the objective outcome measures the risk of detection bias was low. Further evidence to support this comes from trials that have increased step-counts in the long term and have also reduced important clinical outcomes such as fractures and cardiovascular events [92]. Many studies did not mention the theoretical underpinning underlying their behavioural change interventions, and as such we felt that it would be difficult to compare the effect of different studies on this basis.…”

Swiss Francs Seem to Make Insured Move: Comparing Daily and Monthly Financial Incentives of a Scalable Digital Health Intervention

“…Findings from further studies underline the necessity to promote PA. These findings show that PA decreases the risk of mortality (Lear et al, 2017), the risk of noncommunicable diseases such as diabetes, cancer or coronary heart diseases (Kyu et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2012,), and the cox hazard ratio of cardiovascular events and fractures (Harris et al, 2019). Western societies are increasingly becoming older.…”

Daily Step Counts from the First Thailand National Steps Challenge in 2020: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Thailand's national steps challenge policy has been initiated in 2019 by the National Steering Committee on physical activity [16] based on the concept of walking as a central component of physical activity promotion efforts [15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The Thailand National Steps Challenge Season 1 was the countrywide program, implemented from 1 February to 31 March 2020.…”