2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14020449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pebble Size Distribution and Wall Effect on Inner Packing Structure and Contact Force Distribution in Tritium Breeder Pebble Bed

Abstract: In the tritium breeding blanket of nuclear fusion reactors, the heat transfer behavior and thermal-mechanical response of the tritium breeder pebble bed are affected by the inner packing structure, which is crucial for the design and optimization of a reliable pebble bed in tritium breeding blanket. Thus, the effect of pebble size distribution and fixed wall effect on packing structure and contact force in the poly-disperse pebble bed were investigated by numerical simulation. The results show that pebble size… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure S8, with the reaction tube increased from 6 mm ( D / d = 3–6) to 20 mm ( D / d = 10–20), the induction time gradually reduced to about 20 min. Moreover, a lower D / d ratio will give rise to a higher flow velocity along the wall and decrement in efficiency . The breakthrough ratio of reaction with a 6 mm tube increased to 11% after 120 min, while those of 10 and 20 mm tubes kept the entire mercury removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure S8, with the reaction tube increased from 6 mm ( D / d = 3–6) to 20 mm ( D / d = 10–20), the induction time gradually reduced to about 20 min. Moreover, a lower D / d ratio will give rise to a higher flow velocity along the wall and decrement in efficiency . The breakthrough ratio of reaction with a 6 mm tube increased to 11% after 120 min, while those of 10 and 20 mm tubes kept the entire mercury removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the mercury removal declined from nearly 100% to 93.6% within a 600 min adsorption (see the inset in Figure f). The porosity near the wall was higher because the particles contact the confining wall only at a point, while with the wall distance increased, the porosity became smaller. , It resulted in a higher flow velocity along the wall, which is the so-called wall effect. The porosities of packed reactors in the experiments were measured as 24.63%, 19.49%, 17.08%, and 16.80% at the tube diameters of 6, 10, 20, and 30 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The packing characteristics of randomly packed pebble beds are influenced by many factors, such as container dimension and shape, pebble size distribution, and packing mode [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Since most pebble beds are confined by a cylindrical wall in many applications, the packing structures of cylindrical beds have been widely investigated [17][18][19]23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several equations were also proposed to predict the local porosity distributions in three defined zones in a square pebble bed. Gong et al [7,8,32] and Taguchi et al [48] investigated the packing fraction and the local porosity distribution in cylindrical and cubic pebble beds. A similar porosity distribution was obtained in a cubic pebble bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%