1996
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.1.226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of past gymnastics participation on adult bone mass

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to determine bone mineral density (BMD) of former female college gymnasts (FG; n = 18) and controls (FC; n = 15) by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR 1000W) and to examine the relationships between current and former activity levels, diet, menstrual history and BMD. Current physical activity, dietary intake, and menstrual irregularity were assessed with the use of standardized questionnaires. A study-designed questionnaire was used to assess past physical activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
34
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…(31,32) The authors speculated that although some advantages may be lost, these findings suggest that there is a residual benefit of gymnastics participation on bone mass that carries on years after gymnastics participation of the retired gymnasts had ended. (23) However, the active collegiate gymnasts and retired gymnasts in the previous studies were not the same individuals; therefore, the observed differences between groups could also be related to differences in genetics or gymnastics exposure (i.e., years or level of training).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(31,32) The authors speculated that although some advantages may be lost, these findings suggest that there is a residual benefit of gymnastics participation on bone mass that carries on years after gymnastics participation of the retired gymnasts had ended. (23) However, the active collegiate gymnasts and retired gymnasts in the previous studies were not the same individuals; therefore, the observed differences between groups could also be related to differences in genetics or gymnastics exposure (i.e., years or level of training).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(15,17,31) Kirchner and colleagues (23,32) examined current and retired collegiate-level gymnasts and found that both groups had significantly higher aBMD compared with nongymnasts but that the relation was more pronounced in the active college-level gymnasts compared with retired gymnasts. For example, lumbar spine aBMD was 18% greater in collegiate gymnasts and 16% in retired gymnasts and femoral neck aBMD was 22% greater in collegiate gymnasts compared with 18% greater in retired gymnasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…however, compared to current gymnasts their BMD was lower (Kirchner, Lewis, & O'Connor, 1996). One possible conclusion that can be made from these findings is that the older gymnasts never attained the BMD of the current gymnasts; another is that some of the BMD gains of the older gymnasts have diminished over time.…”
Section: Bone Developmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly, the throwing arm of baseball players has been shown to have increased bone mass and improved structure as compared with the non-throwing arm [9]. Running [10][11][12], jumping [13], gymnastics [14,15], weight lifting [16], and swimming [17,18] have all been shown to increase bone mass as compared to sedentary controls. This bone mass response seems to be dependent on the degree to which the activity is weight bearing [19,20], as well as the starting age, with pre-menarche girls having the greatest increase in bone mineral content [21].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%