1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13542.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of passive sensitization on the mechanical activity of human isolated bronchial smooth muscle induced by substance P, neurokinin A and VIP

Abstract: 1 The effect of passive sensitization on the mechanical activity of human isolated bronchial smooth muscle induced by the following neuropeptides substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was studied both in the absence and in the presence of the neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor, phosphoramidon. 2 Cumulative concentration-response curves (CCRC) to these neuropeptides were constructed in human passively sensitized isolated bronchial rings and compared to those in paired c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of the strips to contractile or relax ant agents may be more sensitive when preparations of a smaller size are used, since the technical difficulties due to the diffusion barrier could be reduced somewhat. A simi lar explanation was offered by Ben-Jebria et al [26] about the differences in the data between their study and other previous studies [27,28] regarding the effects of tachvkinins on human airway smooth muscle. They suggested that one possible reason for the interexaminer differences may be a variability in the responses to neuropeptides accord ing to the sizes of the preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The response of the strips to contractile or relax ant agents may be more sensitive when preparations of a smaller size are used, since the technical difficulties due to the diffusion barrier could be reduced somewhat. A simi lar explanation was offered by Ben-Jebria et al [26] about the differences in the data between their study and other previous studies [27,28] regarding the effects of tachvkinins on human airway smooth muscle. They suggested that one possible reason for the interexaminer differences may be a variability in the responses to neuropeptides accord ing to the sizes of the preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The chamber was filled with physiologic solution (composition in mM: 130 NaCl, 5.6 KCl, 1 MgCl 2 , 2.5 CaCl 2 , 11 D -glucose buffered by Tris-HCl to pH 7.4 at 30 Њ C). Tissues were set at optimal length by equilibration against a passive load of 40 mg as determined previously for this type of preparation (18). At the beginning of each experiment, K ϩ -rich (110 mM) solution, was repeatedly applied to obtain at least two contractions similar in both amplitude and kinetics.…”
Section: Isometric Contraction Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 A recent report has examined the eVect of passive sensitisation on the in vitro contractile eVect of SP and NKA on human bronchi. 26 Human bronchi incubated overnight with serum from asthmatic patients sensitised to HDM showed an enhanced sensitivity and an enhanced maximal contractile response to both tachykinins, an eVect which was independent of changes in the activity of neutral endopeptidase. Thus, sensitised airway smooth muscle is more sensitive to tachykinins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%