2017
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/24766.9595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Passive, Active and Combined Warm up on Lower Limb Muscle Performance and Dynamic Stability in Recreational Sports Players

Abstract: Introduction: Warm up is an activity that is done before a sports activity. The warm up can be done actively and passively. The preferred mode is active warm up in athletes. There are inconclusive effects of passive warm up compared with an active warm up on short term muscle performance. The cumulative effect of passive and active warm up on muscle performance and dynamic stability is not known. Aim:To find out the effects of passive, active and combined warm up on lower limb muscle performance and dynamic st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the results from the current investigation to previous literature is difficult due to the unique nature of the protocol used. However, previous research has employed a control group which is not genuinely a pure control group because it incorporated a self-selected warm-up rather ©EJSSE than no warm-up at all, like a 3-minute to 5-minute run or a personal stretching (Atkinson et al, 2005;Gogte et al, 2017;Sánchez-Sánchez et al, 2017;Young & Behm, 2003). These studies did not show significant differences between the experimental and control groups in sports performance using dependent variables such as jumping, repeated sprints, or another performancerelated test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the results from the current investigation to previous literature is difficult due to the unique nature of the protocol used. However, previous research has employed a control group which is not genuinely a pure control group because it incorporated a self-selected warm-up rather ©EJSSE than no warm-up at all, like a 3-minute to 5-minute run or a personal stretching (Atkinson et al, 2005;Gogte et al, 2017;Sánchez-Sánchez et al, 2017;Young & Behm, 2003). These studies did not show significant differences between the experimental and control groups in sports performance using dependent variables such as jumping, repeated sprints, or another performancerelated test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine total volume/session for our proprioceptive protocol, we extensively studied previous methodologies on the use of unstable surfaces in warm-up procedures in young adults. Differently from our proprioceptive tasks (landings), most studies used static, predominantly standing balancing tasks the volume of which was expressed in durations ranging from 1 min ( Gogte, 2017 ) to as long as 18–25 min ( Muehlbauer et al, 2021 ) ( Romero-Franco et al, 2013 ), the latter inducing significant fatigue. The closest to our methodology was the one reported by Kyranoudis et al (2020) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this research tries to perform optimal recovery; and it is very important to keep players from high-performance training [15,16]. Recovery is an activity carried out after sports activities through an active and passive treatment system [27]. The recovery mode has an inconclusive effect of passive recovery compared to active recovery on short-term muscle performance, particularly in improving volleyball smash technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%