2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2013.2245409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Chain Structures in Magnetorheological Fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 Furthermore, magnetic fluid characteristics and structures differ under varying alternating magnetic field strengths, such that the fraction of agglomerates changes the magnetization and susceptibility of the ferrofluid. 19,20 In this work, we proposed a revised cluster-based model to more accurately estimate the SLP by considering magnetic nanoparticle aggregation. Under an alternating magnetic field, magnetic susceptibility is temperature dependent and can be conveniently described by the Langevin function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Furthermore, magnetic fluid characteristics and structures differ under varying alternating magnetic field strengths, such that the fraction of agglomerates changes the magnetization and susceptibility of the ferrofluid. 19,20 In this work, we proposed a revised cluster-based model to more accurately estimate the SLP by considering magnetic nanoparticle aggregation. Under an alternating magnetic field, magnetic susceptibility is temperature dependent and can be conveniently described by the Langevin function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, only two papers, the papers by Wang et al (1997) and Sherman and Wereley (2013) address this issue. A pioneering paper by Wang et al (1997) used 2D molecular dynamic simulation methods to demonstrate that the shear stress of ER fluids decreases with increasing the standard deviation of a Gaussian distribution of the particle size and then reaches a steady value at high polydispersity levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal forces were not included in the simulations and only two Mason numbers were investigated. More recently, Sherman and Wereley (2013) carried out a large-scale (high particle count) simulation study on polydisperse MR fluids with lognormal distribution at a particle volume concentration of / ¼ 0:30. In their study, the mean particle diameter was fixed at 8 lm and the carrier fluid viscosity was 0.1 Pa s. They investigated the structure formation and shear rheology for a wide range in standard deviation of the distribution from 0.001 to 0.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, we believe that the hydrodynamic size distribution of magnetic nanoparticles follows lognormal distribution [31,32,33,34] f(d)=1d2πσexp[12σ2(lndμ)2] here, d is the diameter of particles, μ is the median diameter of the lognormal distribution, σ is the standard deviation of lnd. Therefore, the lognormal distribution function is used to fit the hydrodynamic size distribution measured by DLS, and the results are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%