2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of particle size and shear speed on frictional instability in sheared granular materials during large shear displacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many processes are responsible for the generation of AEs in stressed geologic materials, and possible mechanisms have been reported [e.g., Lockner, 1993;Michlmayr et al, 2012]. For example, the coherent rupture of many asperities has been proposed as the source mechanism for AE events and mechanical failures on bare rock surfaces [e.g., Lockner, 1993;Kato et al, 1994;Yabe et al, 2003], and the abstract concept of force chains among sheared granular materials has recently been adopted to explain the mechanical behaviors observed in the laboratory conditions [e.g., Mair et al, 2002;Anthony and Marone, 2005;Jiang et al, 2016]. However, for sheared granular materials, the asperity model may not directly account for the complicated evolutions of grain contacts due to the many degrees of freedom in granular systems [e.g., Sammis and Steacy, 1994;Cates et al, 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many processes are responsible for the generation of AEs in stressed geologic materials, and possible mechanisms have been reported [e.g., Lockner, 1993;Michlmayr et al, 2012]. For example, the coherent rupture of many asperities has been proposed as the source mechanism for AE events and mechanical failures on bare rock surfaces [e.g., Lockner, 1993;Kato et al, 1994;Yabe et al, 2003], and the abstract concept of force chains among sheared granular materials has recently been adopted to explain the mechanical behaviors observed in the laboratory conditions [e.g., Mair et al, 2002;Anthony and Marone, 2005;Jiang et al, 2016]. However, for sheared granular materials, the asperity model may not directly account for the complicated evolutions of grain contacts due to the many degrees of freedom in granular systems [e.g., Sammis and Steacy, 1994;Cates et al, 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a generally accepted fact that the measurement of the residual strength is most preferred done with a ring shear test since it allows the soil specimen be sheared at unlimited displacement which can simulate the field conditions more accurately (Lupini et al, 1981;Tiwari and Marui, 2005;Bhat, 2013;Sassa et al, 2004). Until now, several relationships between the residual strength and soil index parameters have been reported in the literature with a wide range of soil by using various kinds of ring shear apparatus (Hoyos et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2016;Kimura et al, 2015;Li et al, 2013;. Furthermore, many studies have shown that the shearing rate may or may not affect the minimum value of soil strength at residual states (Suzuki et al, 2007;Grelle and Guadagno, 2010;Gonghui et al, 2010;Bhat, 2013;Tika and Hutchinson, 1999;Lemos, 1985;Morgenstern and Hungr, 1984;Tika, 1999).…”
Section: . Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behavior of rock joints and fault systems in the presence of gouges depends highly on the morphology of the bounding surfaces, such as roughness 1,2 and also the characteristics of the filling material such as grain size, shape and mineralogy. [3][4][5] Roughness (as well as asperity geometry and structure in a more general sense) is key to be modeled in the analysis of tribological problems with applications from movements of large-scale geological structures to smaller-size grain-to-grain interactions of particulate matter. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Large-scale experiments (in terms of shearing displacement), mostly direct or double-direct shearing tests, have emphasized the influence of the said characteristics, alongside the rate of shearing, on the mechanical behavior of geological interfaces/structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] Large-scale experiments (in terms of shearing displacement), mostly direct or double-direct shearing tests, have emphasized the influence of the said characteristics, alongside the rate of shearing, on the mechanical behavior of geological interfaces/structures. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The occurrence of stick-slip instability/unstable slip in many geological structures can be observed in the events of shallow earthquakes and landslides, 4,19 which phenomenon is often replicated in large-scale laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation