2017
DOI: 10.1002/pc.24287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of particle–particle and polymer–particle interactions on nanosilica aggregation in polystyrene

Abstract: In this work, we show that the particle–particle interactions are more effective than polymer–particle interactions on the dispersion of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanosilica in polystyrene (PS) nanocomposites. The surface hydrophobization of nanoparticles weakens the particle‐particle interaction and prevents nanoparticle aggregation. Rheological measurements are employed to study the aggregation behavior of samples. A comparative faster stress relaxation modulus G(t) indicates the lower extent of aggre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lines around the particles indicated that it caused the extra stress concentration. When adding to the particles to the matrix, the wetting of the particles with the matrix was very important [31]. The presence of particle traces on the fracture surfaces indicated that the particles were held in place by the matrix material.…”
Section: Morphology Of the Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lines around the particles indicated that it caused the extra stress concentration. When adding to the particles to the matrix, the wetting of the particles with the matrix was very important [31]. The presence of particle traces on the fracture surfaces indicated that the particles were held in place by the matrix material.…”
Section: Morphology Of the Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 1 g CNT to make 1 L CNT suspension, and therefore the weight ratio of CNT:SDS was set to 1:23 in the 1 L of deionized water. 26…”
Section: Experimental Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 1 g CNT to make 1 L CNT suspension, and therefore the weight ratio of CNT:SDS was set to 1:23 in the 1 L of deionized water. 26 In order to create CNT suspension, the materials were prepared and stirred for 15 min, then uniformly dispersed in deionized water with sonication process. According to Figure 2, the sonication process was done with BANDELIN-HD 3200 with the probe model VS-70T.…”
Section: Preparation Of Cnt Suspensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18,22 Hence, model simulation of the rheological response of nanocomposites can offer us an outline for the description/prediction of their properties as a function of process and material parameters. [23][24][25][26][27] Experimental results of polymer nanocomposites' viscoelasticity display a substantial improvement in the glassy state (elasticity plateau modulus) with increasing the nanofiller loading. Additionally, under certain conditions, a level of the storage modulus, that is, a weak frequency dependence, was detected at very low frequencies, revealing a solid-like behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%