2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of partial Mo substitution by W on HDS activity using sulfide CoMoW/Al2O3–TiO2 catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another work, Chao et al [68] reached a conversion around 80% at 603 K and 3.5 Mpa with a model fuel containing thiophene at an initial concentration of 1500 ppm. In several other studies where the alumina was used as support, even though under harsh operating reaction (temperature, pressure), the catalyst activity was found lower than or equal to those of the current study [69][70][71]. Beside the excellent performance of the prepared catalysts in this study, they were prepared by a far simpler and faster procedure than all the above mentioned catalysts.…”
Section: Tpr Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…In another work, Chao et al [68] reached a conversion around 80% at 603 K and 3.5 Mpa with a model fuel containing thiophene at an initial concentration of 1500 ppm. In several other studies where the alumina was used as support, even though under harsh operating reaction (temperature, pressure), the catalyst activity was found lower than or equal to those of the current study [69][70][71]. Beside the excellent performance of the prepared catalysts in this study, they were prepared by a far simpler and faster procedure than all the above mentioned catalysts.…”
Section: Tpr Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…47,48 Little adsorption at low relative pressure (below 0.2) can be attributed to the micropores, while adsorption at relative pressure above 0.7 originated from the presence of mesopores. 35 A similar result was obtained by Obeso-Estrella et al 49 Furthermore, the pore diameter distribution of the samples resulted from Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) calculation indicated narrow distributions at low fuel content. By increasing the fuel content, a shi to larger pore diameters has obtained in the case of NMACA2 and NMACA4, yielding a broaden pore diameter distribution.…”
Section: Fesem Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Early studies showed for example that Mo over Al/Ti = 1 and Ti/(Ti + Zr) = 0.8 supports lead to the highest activities among tested catalysts for hydrocracking and coal-derived liquids upgrading [69]. For the HDS of DBT, several reports have been published using Al/Ti = 2 to obtain the highest activity [4,35,52,55] among materials prepared by the sol-gel method.…”
Section: Mixed Oxides Support: a Different Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%