2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2021.105073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of packing density of lipid vesicles on the Aβ42 fibril polymorphism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with previous findings where TEM images of fibrils in the presence of LUVs with complex lipid mixtures showed no morphological changes and only weak association between fibrils and LUVs. 10,16 The lack of strong interactions between LUVs and fibrils suggests that the LUVs facilitate the aggregation via a catalytic mechanism that involves interaction with smaller species rather than fibrils. According to this mechanism, the LUV membranes might promote the aggregation of Aβ 42 by transiently binding small species, thereby facilitating nucleation through locally increased concentrations.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agrees with previous findings where TEM images of fibrils in the presence of LUVs with complex lipid mixtures showed no morphological changes and only weak association between fibrils and LUVs. 10,16 The lack of strong interactions between LUVs and fibrils suggests that the LUVs facilitate the aggregation via a catalytic mechanism that involves interaction with smaller species rather than fibrils. According to this mechanism, the LUV membranes might promote the aggregation of Aβ 42 by transiently binding small species, thereby facilitating nucleation through locally increased concentrations.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, no or only weak association was found between the Aβ 42 fibrils and the SUVs ( Figure 2 f-j ), in a way which resembles previous findings where TEM images of fibrils in presence of SUVs with complex lipid mixtures showed no morphological changes and only partial interactions between fibrils and SUVs. 10,16…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, no or only weak association was found between the Ab 42 fibrils and the SUVs (Figure 2 f-j), in a way which resembles previous findings where TEM images of fibrils in presence of SUVs with complex lipid mixtures showed no morphological changes and only partial interactions between fibrils and SUVs. 10,16 A possible explanation of the lack of strong interactions is that the SUVs facilitate the aggregation via a catalytic mechanism that involves the stabilization of the aggregation intermediates, but not of the reactants and the products of the aggregation reaction. According to this mechanism, the SUVs membranes might promote the aggregation of Ab 42 by transiently binding oligomeric species exposing extended hydrophobic surfaces, while not interacting permanently with the monomeric and the fibrillar forms, which expose fewer hydrophobic regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lipid properties such as charge, headgroup composition and ionic strength affect these interactions and change various aspects of the fibrillation process. For example, the Aβ peptide forms short fibrils in the presence of DOPC vesicles but longer fibrils with vesicles containing negatively charged headgroups like DOPG and DOPS [14]. Of equal importance, these membranes greatly accelerate fibrillation of Aβ and both the fibrillation process and formation of toxic oligomers can lead to membrane disruption [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%