2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00574-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ozonation for reducing membrane-fouling in the UF membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many bench-scale and pilot studies have been performed to elucidate the impact of ozonation -alone or in combination with other pretreatment processes -on the flux performance of polymeric UF [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and NF [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] membranes. Feed waters included natural surface water [8,[13][14][15]19], wastewater treatment plant effluent [9][10][11]17], dairy wastewater [18], and landfill leachate [22] among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many bench-scale and pilot studies have been performed to elucidate the impact of ozonation -alone or in combination with other pretreatment processes -on the flux performance of polymeric UF [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and NF [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] membranes. Feed waters included natural surface water [8,[13][14][15]19], wastewater treatment plant effluent [9][10][11]17], dairy wastewater [18], and landfill leachate [22] among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed waters included natural surface water [8,[13][14][15]19], wastewater treatment plant effluent [9][10][11]17], dairy wastewater [18], and landfill leachate [22] among others. In some cases, ozonation was found to be effective in reducing UF and NF membrane fouling [9][10][11]13,14,18,19] while in other studies no improvement in the permeate flux due to pre-ozonation was observed [8,[15][16][17]21,22]. These differences were likely due to the complex dependence of fouling behavior on study-specific process parameters: feed water chemistry, O 3 dosage, additional pretreatment steps [12,23], membrane surface chemistry, presence of microorganisms and biopolymers in the feed, and membrane type (UF versus NF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that the flux rate increased by about 12% as the ozone input increased. It was also realized that ozonation did not have a significant role to prevent membrane fouling, and it made the permeate flux increase, but ozone and hydrogen peroxide was more effective (28).…”
Section: Feed Pretreatment In Membrane Fouling Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfilters have relatively higher fluxes compared to ultrafiltration, but the latter results in higher purification efficiency. To reduce fouling, highly hydrophilic membranes [25,31,32] can be used (in case oil in water emulsions), or membrane separation can be combined with other methods such as gas injection [33], ozonation [34,35] or destabilization [5,36]. In the recent study of M. Matos et al [5] destabilization/centrifugation/ultrafiltration hybrid process was applied with high efficiency (97.4%) to purify oil in water emulsion, using calcium chloride coagulant and ZrO 2 ceramic ultrafilter (300 kDa) membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%