2014
DOI: 10.2138/am.2014.4669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of orientation on ion track formation in apatite and zircon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that this effect should be present in most crystalline materials, as they often possess different values for the thermal conductivity in different crystallographic directions. This could possibly explain similar differences observed in quartz [29,30] and apatite [45]. To resolve the small magnitude of such differences, however, requires accurate measurements of the track radii such as those attainable by SAXS.…”
Section: Thermal-spike Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is important to note that this effect should be present in most crystalline materials, as they often possess different values for the thermal conductivity in different crystallographic directions. This could possibly explain similar differences observed in quartz [29,30] and apatite [45]. To resolve the small magnitude of such differences, however, requires accurate measurements of the track radii such as those attainable by SAXS.…”
Section: Thermal-spike Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Annealing of FTs in apatite and zircon is primarily a function of the thermal history and grain chemistry (Barbarand et al, 2003;Carlson et al, 1999;Green et al, 1986;Ketcham et al, 1999;Ketcham et al, 2007;Tagami et al, 1998;Yamada et al, 1995). More specifically, FTs anneal by temperature-controlled atomic diffusion, observed from the microscopic to atomic scales (Barbarand et al, 2003;Laslett et al, 1987;Li et al, 2011;Li et al, 2014). The T c for the AFT and ZFT systems are~80-120°C and~180-250°C (e.g., Bernet, 2009;Ketcham et al, 2007;Figure 1).…”
Section: Ft Thermochronometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For purposes of estimating bulk-mineral properties and percolation, the damaged domain of a single α-recoil has been variously modeled as a sphere as small as 3 nm in diameter (Trachenko et al 2003(Trachenko et al , 2004Palenik et al 2003) or a cylinder up to 2.5 nm diameter × 40 nm long (Jonckheere and Gögen 2001; Ketcham et al 2013), but the boundaries are indistinct and damage can extend further. Domains of α-recoil damage and single fission tracks have been imaged by TEM (Miller and Ewing 1993;Ewing et al 2003;Utsunomiya et al 2004;Li et al 2014). However, the shape of the path of highest defect density and processes of defect recombination are not well understood.…”
Section: Radiation Damage In Zirconmentioning
confidence: 99%