2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-011-0618-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of organic solvent on morphology and mechanical properties of electrospun syndiotactic polypropylene nanofibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Polypropylene nanofibers prepared with cyclohexane exhibited a rougher surface when compared to the fibers prepared with decalin, suggesting that the surface morphology of the nanofibers depend on the boiling point of each solvent [ 93 ]. When stress–strain behaviors of the nanofibers are investigated, a tensile strength of 61.4 ± 1.5 MPa with 35.2% ± 1.7% of strain, and a Young modulus of 174.6 ± 1.7 MPa was obtained for the decalin based nanofibers, whilst the cyclohexane nanofibers exhibit a tensile strength of 18.2 ± 1.1 MPa with 46.7% ± 1.2% of elongation and a Young modulus of 39.1 ± 1.4 MPa [ 94 ]. The abovementioned results were obtained from bundles of nanofibers rather than individual fibers, these properties are strongly dependent on fiber orientation within the tested sample, bonding between fibers, and slip of one fiber over another [ 94 ].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypropylene nanofibers prepared with cyclohexane exhibited a rougher surface when compared to the fibers prepared with decalin, suggesting that the surface morphology of the nanofibers depend on the boiling point of each solvent [ 93 ]. When stress–strain behaviors of the nanofibers are investigated, a tensile strength of 61.4 ± 1.5 MPa with 35.2% ± 1.7% of strain, and a Young modulus of 174.6 ± 1.7 MPa was obtained for the decalin based nanofibers, whilst the cyclohexane nanofibers exhibit a tensile strength of 18.2 ± 1.1 MPa with 46.7% ± 1.2% of elongation and a Young modulus of 39.1 ± 1.4 MPa [ 94 ]. The abovementioned results were obtained from bundles of nanofibers rather than individual fibers, these properties are strongly dependent on fiber orientation within the tested sample, bonding between fibers, and slip of one fiber over another [ 94 ].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are significant in the context of comparison to electrospun PP fibers with a reported modulus on the order of 20 MPa as a non-woven and up to 170 MPa as a single fiber, compared to a modulus of 2160 MPa for the extruded HDPE/PP fiber mat at DR 11. [49] The lowest modulus fiber mats produced via melt coextrusion still have a modulus 650% higher than an equivalent electrospun mat, which can be attributed to the improved crystallization achieved by melt processing. The crystallinity achieved in electrospun fibers is limited by the rate of nucleation and growth compared to the rate of solvent evaporation in electrospinning and cannot be improved via drawing and orientation; for the electrospun PP fibers, higher boiling point solvents were shown to increase crystallinity and enhance mechanics.…”
Section: Fiber Mat Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high solvent resistance of the polymer, there is only a small selection of solvents that allow further processing, some of them allow dissolution only at elevated temperatures. Nevertheless, there are some studies on processability and fiber analysis of polypropylene fibers spun by solvent electrospinning (14)(15)(16)(17). A study by Cho et al compares the solution and melt electrospinning of polypropylene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%