2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of organic phase change material and surfactant on HCFC141b hydrate nucleation in quiescent conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown that supercooling of DHPD was reduced from 8.3 to 2.8 °C in DHPD-Gel, which is attributed to the thickening effect of the sodium polyacrylate crosslinking network. Further improvement was achieved with EmulGel (1:3), where supercooling was eliminated, possibly due to the heterogeneous nucleation effect of Span80, F-SiO 2 , or eicosane. , The decrease in the degree of supercooling is also confirmed by the fact that the DHPD in EmulGel (1:3) readily crystallized when cooled from its melt to 20 °C and that it showed a nearly identical melting peak compared to when the sample was cooled to −10 °C (Figure e). Pure DHPD did not show any melting peak when reheated from 20 °C (see Figure f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is shown that supercooling of DHPD was reduced from 8.3 to 2.8 °C in DHPD-Gel, which is attributed to the thickening effect of the sodium polyacrylate crosslinking network. Further improvement was achieved with EmulGel (1:3), where supercooling was eliminated, possibly due to the heterogeneous nucleation effect of Span80, F-SiO 2 , or eicosane. , The decrease in the degree of supercooling is also confirmed by the fact that the DHPD in EmulGel (1:3) readily crystallized when cooled from its melt to 20 °C and that it showed a nearly identical melting peak compared to when the sample was cooled to −10 °C (Figure e). Pure DHPD did not show any melting peak when reheated from 20 °C (see Figure f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Promoters include kinetic promoters and thermodynamic promoters. Thermodynamic promoters usually improve the equilibrium conditions of hydrate formation by filling hydrate cages and increase the driving force of hydrate formation. Delahaye et al studied the effect of tetrahydrofuran (THF) with a mass concentration of 3.98–15.00 wt % on the equilibrium conditions of CO 2 hydrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microspheres can be prepared via the O/W Pickering route 45 , which could be hotpressed to make composite films 32 . If W/O systems are utilized, porous polymer materials can be obtained 46 .…”
Section: Preparation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molten aqueous phase remained confined inside the gel due to the efficient sealing by the internal hydrophilic polymer network and eicosane acting as a powerful sealant. EmulGel (1:3), where supercooling was eliminated, possibly due to the heterogeneous nucleation effect of Span80, F-SiO2, or eicosane [44][45] . The decrease in degree of supercooling is also confirmed by the fact that the DHPD in EmulGel (1:3) readily crystallized when cooled from its melt to 20 ℃ and that it showed a nearly identical melting peak compared to when the sample was cooled to -10 ℃ (Figure 7.3e).…”
Section: Water Retention Ability and Degree Of Supercooling Of Emulgelsmentioning
confidence: 99%