2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aab2ef
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of organic and inorganic nitrates on cerebrovascular pulsatile power transmission in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Abstract: Organic nitrates, but not inorganic nitrates, increase the amount of hydraulic energy transmitted into the carotid artery in subjects with HFpEF. These findings may have implications for the adverse effect profiles of these agents (such as the differential incidence of headaches) and for the pulsatile hemodynamic stress of the brain microvasculature in this patient population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What we found is consistent with a recently published multicenter trial by Borlaug et al (28), which demonstrated that inhaled sodium nitrite did not improved the clinical status of patients with chronic HFpEF. Our results are also in agreement with several previous studies showing that a dietary nitrate intake in the form of BRJ did not improve exercise intolerance or hemodynamics indicators such as mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or cardiac output in HFpEF patients, although the concentration and duration of BRJ intervention in these studies varied (29,31,32). The reasons for the discrepancies between the rationale that nitric oxide possesses the ability of improving microcirculation and cardiac function in patients with HFpEF and the absence of clinical benefit are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…What we found is consistent with a recently published multicenter trial by Borlaug et al (28), which demonstrated that inhaled sodium nitrite did not improved the clinical status of patients with chronic HFpEF. Our results are also in agreement with several previous studies showing that a dietary nitrate intake in the form of BRJ did not improve exercise intolerance or hemodynamics indicators such as mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or cardiac output in HFpEF patients, although the concentration and duration of BRJ intervention in these studies varied (29,31,32). The reasons for the discrepancies between the rationale that nitric oxide possesses the ability of improving microcirculation and cardiac function in patients with HFpEF and the absence of clinical benefit are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Through a literature searching, we identified 421 studies, of which eight RCTs with 335 patients were eventually included in the current meta-analysis (Figure 1). The eight RCTs were all published after 2014, comparing the effect of inorganic nitrate/nitrite on HFpEF with that of placebo (21,25,26,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). Four trials were parallel-group design with baseline characteristics well matched in two arms (25,26,30,32).…”
Section: Search Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 135) Unlike organic nitrates, these effects were achieved without significantly reducing MAP or cerebrovascular resistance and without increasing pulsatile power penetration into the cerebrovascular circulation. 133) 136) Inhaled sodium nitrite, on the other hand, has a very short half (<40 minutes) and its intermittent administration results in pronounced circulating nitrite level fluctuations, which are unlikely to exert sustained therapeutic effects throughout the day. Accordingly, inhaled inorganic nitrite was not effective in improving exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF.…”
Section: Therapeutic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, wave power is conserved at junctions and therefore the distribution of wave power to different vessel branches can be quantified. For example, unlike wave intensity which is not conserved, it has been possible to meaningfully quantify the percentage of ascending aortic wave power that passes into the carotid artery and how this changes with pharmacological intervention ( Londono-Hoyos et al, 2018 ). Finally, wave power is linked to the hydraulic pressure power of flowing blood (Π P = PQ ), which determines total ventricular workload ( Laskey et al, 1985 ).…”
Section: Wave Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%