2011
DOI: 10.1177/0269881111409607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of orexin-B-saporin-induced lesions of the lateral hypothalamus on performance on a progressive ratio schedule

Abstract: (2012) Effect of orexin-B-saporin-induced lesions of the lateral hypothalamus on performance on a progressive ratio schedule. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 26 (6 A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(272 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest a role for LH, and especially orexin neurons, in modulating two amygdala‐dependent behaviors that are often attributed to learned attentional processes: the acquisition of conditioned ORs and the surprise‐induced enhancement of cue associability. The LH lesion effects we observed are unlikely to be related to motor consequences of orexin‐saporin LH lesions that many investigators have described (Grossberg et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Olarte‐Sanchez et al ., ), or the general disruption of learning, feeding, motivation and even survival often found with widespread, bilateral damage to LH (Teitelbaum & Epstein, ). Our lesioned rats showed levels of general activity similar to those of sham‐lesioned rats, no deficits in the display of unconditioned ORs, and no deficits in the acquisition of food cup responses under conditions in which associability enhancements were not expected (that is, in experiments 1 and 2, and in the consistent condition of experiment 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest a role for LH, and especially orexin neurons, in modulating two amygdala‐dependent behaviors that are often attributed to learned attentional processes: the acquisition of conditioned ORs and the surprise‐induced enhancement of cue associability. The LH lesion effects we observed are unlikely to be related to motor consequences of orexin‐saporin LH lesions that many investigators have described (Grossberg et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Olarte‐Sanchez et al ., ), or the general disruption of learning, feeding, motivation and even survival often found with widespread, bilateral damage to LH (Teitelbaum & Epstein, ). Our lesioned rats showed levels of general activity similar to those of sham‐lesioned rats, no deficits in the display of unconditioned ORs, and no deficits in the acquisition of food cup responses under conditions in which associability enhancements were not expected (that is, in experiments 1 and 2, and in the consistent condition of experiment 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, co-option of the linear waiting principle (Wynne et al 1996 ) enables the new model to provide a dynamic account of the progressively increasing post-reinforcement pause duration that accompanies the increasing ratio requirement specified by PR schedules. Secondly, the new model explicitly acknowledges the qualitatively different profiles of running and overall response rates that have proven to be a significant problem in applications of the FR model to PR schedule performance (Rickard et al 2009 ; Olarte-Sánchez et al 2012a , b ). Thirdly, the new model deconstructs pausing into two meaningful categories: post-reinforcement pausing, governed by the linear waiting principle, and ‘response time’ (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-reinforcement pause duration was measured from the end of the reinforcer delivery until the emission of the first response of the following ratio. The breakpoint was defined as the last ratio to be completed before 5 min elapsed without any responding, or, in cases where this criterion was not met within the session, the highest completed ratio (Olarte-Sánchez et al 2012a , b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 minute sessions took place at the same time each day during the light phase (between 08:00 and 13:00 hours) for 1 week. The breakpoint or alternatively the highest completed ratio ( Olarte-Sánchez et al., 2012 ) was defined as the last ratio completed before 5 minutes elapsed without any responding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%