2021
DOI: 10.31288/oftalmolzh202154755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of optical-reflection method of accommodative facility training on meridional acuity in astigmats with amblyopia

Abstract: The efficacy of accommodative facility training as a method of treatment for meridional amblyopia (MA) in astigmatic children with amblyopia was studied. MA manifests itself as selective alterations in visual acuity (VA), with substantial differences in the ability to resolve contours of different orientations, and may cause impairments in mechanisms of integrated processing of visual stimulus, development of cognitive abilities in children and visual performance. Purpose: To assess the effect of optical-refle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research should be conducted on this topic. In addition, the Landolt ring is superior in detecting with-the-rule astigmatism and against-the-rule astigmatism because it has four directions (up, down, left, right) [52]. On the other hand, the pediatric optotype developed in this study is not capable of selectively displaying the four directions and is, therefore, considered inferior to the Landolt ring in detecting astigmatism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Further research should be conducted on this topic. In addition, the Landolt ring is superior in detecting with-the-rule astigmatism and against-the-rule astigmatism because it has four directions (up, down, left, right) [52]. On the other hand, the pediatric optotype developed in this study is not capable of selectively displaying the four directions and is, therefore, considered inferior to the Landolt ring in detecting astigmatism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%