2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of operational parameters on distillate flux in direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): Comparison between experimental and model predicted performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further annealing for another day led to a greater decrease in the range of the pore diameter and a sharp peak appeared, although the average mean pore size was further slightly increased to 1.3 μm (which was same as that of the neat membrane). An increased average pore diameter led to an increase in the flux performance [36], justifying that MD applied with the A2 and A3 membranes had the highest flux performance compared to the other samples. In the literature, the pore size distribution of commercial MD membranes generally lies between 0.2 μm and 1 μm as the increase in the maximum pore size greatly decreases the LEP, leading to serious wetting problems [3,6].…”
Section: Improvement Of Membrane Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Further annealing for another day led to a greater decrease in the range of the pore diameter and a sharp peak appeared, although the average mean pore size was further slightly increased to 1.3 μm (which was same as that of the neat membrane). An increased average pore diameter led to an increase in the flux performance [36], justifying that MD applied with the A2 and A3 membranes had the highest flux performance compared to the other samples. In the literature, the pore size distribution of commercial MD membranes generally lies between 0.2 μm and 1 μm as the increase in the maximum pore size greatly decreases the LEP, leading to serious wetting problems [3,6].…”
Section: Improvement Of Membrane Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, their system still needed membrane cleaning and drying after wetting occurrence [29]. Several authors have placed spacers in MD modules and have carried out experimental and theoretical investigations on the subject [30][31][32][33][34]. In their results, they published notable enhancement on heat and mass transfer and consequently the mass flux in spacer filled modules and provided suggestions on optimal spacer geometry, voidage, and hydrodynamic angle [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For a model of DCMD to be applicable to large-scale systems, it must account for changes in operational variable values-such as temperature, flow rate, and salinity-along the length of the membrane. Most of the earlier models of DCMD neglected the changing nature of operational variables from inlet to outlet, instead relying on inlet or average conditions for calculation across the entire membrane area [22,23,28,33,37,38]. Neglecting the changing nature of operational variable values along the length of the membrane may produce little error at the bench-scale, but is likely to introduce significant error in more realistic, large-scale membrane modules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%