2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in flight height reduces the effect of airflow that projects the droplets toward the target, thereby altering their deposition on the plant canopy. Ahmad et al (2020) also observed that increasing the flight height and speed reduces the droplet deposition on the target. In tree crops, Meng et al (2020) studied the effects of speed (2.0 m s -1 to 5.0 m s -1 ) and flight path (intra-and inter-planting line) on the percentage of target coverage and observed that both factors were influenced by the shape of the plant canopy in a peach crop.…”
Section: Factors That Interfere With the Spray Deposition On The Targetmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in flight height reduces the effect of airflow that projects the droplets toward the target, thereby altering their deposition on the plant canopy. Ahmad et al (2020) also observed that increasing the flight height and speed reduces the droplet deposition on the target. In tree crops, Meng et al (2020) studied the effects of speed (2.0 m s -1 to 5.0 m s -1 ) and flight path (intra-and inter-planting line) on the percentage of target coverage and observed that both factors were influenced by the shape of the plant canopy in a peach crop.…”
Section: Factors That Interfere With the Spray Deposition On The Targetmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In general, applications have been performed between 1.0 m to 3.0 m of height and 1.0 m s -1 to 7.0 m s -1 of velocity, as can be observed in the works of Liao et al (2019), Wang et al (2020 c), Ahmad et al (2020), andChen et al (2020). Wang et al (2020 d) showed that it is critical to find a balance between height and speed to achieve a satisfactory application.…”
Section: Factors That Interfere With the Spray Deposition On The Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute value of the difference between the experiment and simulation deposition percentages is plotted in Figure 7 . The droplet deposition curve is axisymmetric because the environment wind velocity is set to zero in the simulation, and the maximum deposition percentage is 13.1% at Z = 1 m. The outdoor experiment’s deposition curve slightly deviates to the positive Z−direction due to the effect of crosswind and non vertical nozzles [ 19 ]. The maximum simulation error occurrs at Z = −1.5 m, which is 8.7%, and the error of other areas is within 5%.…”
Section: Application and Verification Of Cfd Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 9 d, the deposition distribution at the margin slightly increases with the increase in height. This condition may be due to the trajectory change caused by the breakup of droplets [ 19 ].…”
Section: Simulation Deposition Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement the technology, an unmanned aerial system BAS-137 VIM was developed on the basis of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of a coaxial helicopter type BVS-137 VIM (takeoff weight 280 kg, payload 80 kg) and an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based on a gyroplane (takeoff weight 750 kg, payload up to 400 kg) for differentiated application of pesticides, fertilizers and other agrochemicals in the precision farming system [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%