2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.11.5378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Once-Weekly Epoetin Beta on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline- and/or Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: Results of the Breast Cancer—Anemia and the Value of Erythropoietin (BRAVE) Study

Abstract: In patients with MBC receiving chemotherapy and initial Hb less than 12.9 g/dL, epoetin beta increased Hb. No difference was detected in overall survival. Because of its superiority design, this study cannot, however, exclude clinically important differences in survival with absolute certainty.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
54
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this updated meta-analysis also includes long-term follow-up data from more recent studies and largely confirms the results of the earlier metaanalysis of nine controlled studies (n ¼ 1413) (Aapro et al, 2006), which did not include the recently completed studies by Henke et al (2003); Aapro et al (2008) and Strauss et al (2008). Moreover, this update confirms the safety of epoetin-b in terms of overall Figure 1 Kaplan -Meier curves of (A) overall survival and (B) time to progression in the pooled population of 12 controlled studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, this updated meta-analysis also includes long-term follow-up data from more recent studies and largely confirms the results of the earlier metaanalysis of nine controlled studies (n ¼ 1413) (Aapro et al, 2006), which did not include the recently completed studies by Henke et al (2003); Aapro et al (2008) and Strauss et al (2008). Moreover, this update confirms the safety of epoetin-b in terms of overall Figure 1 Kaplan -Meier curves of (A) overall survival and (B) time to progression in the pooled population of 12 controlled studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Other studies were, however, designed to assess the effects of epoetin-b on survival and/or disease progression (Henke et al, 2003;Aapro et al, 2008) or Hb response to treatment (Strauss et al, 2008). Long-term follow-up information, up to 60 months, was available for overall survival in four studies (Henke et al, 2003;Ö sterborg et al, 2005;Aapro et al, 2008;Strauss et al, 2008) and for tumour progression in three studies (Henke et al, 2003;Aapro et al, 2008;Strauss et al, 2008). All reported adverse events were also reviewed against a prespecified list of TEEs, the definition of which was consistently applied across all studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that alongside the beneficial effects of EPO, a concern that EPO treatment for anemia might adversely affect the prognosis in certain cases of solid tumor cancers (Aapro et al, 2008;Henke et al, 2006;Longmore, 2007) has been raised. In that respect although EPO-Rs were found in certain solid tumors (Acs et al, 2003;Arcasoy et al, 2002;Yasuda et al, 2003), their functionality is still controversial Jeong et al, 2008;Laugsch et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the meta-analysis, this information was analysed retrospectively by reviewers blinded to treatment assignment. Four of the studies, which did evaluate the effects of epoetin-b on survival and/or disease progression (Henke et al, 2003;Ö sterborg et al, 2005;Aapro et al, 2008b) or response to treatment (Strauss et al, 2008) provided long-term (up to 60 months) follow-up information for overall survival or tumour progression. For the assessment of TEEs, all reported adverse events were reviewed against a pre-specified list of TEEs, which was applied consistently across all studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously reported results of an updated meta-analysis of 12 randomised, controlled studies of epoetin-b conducted in 2301 patients undergoing cancer therapy (Aapro et al, 2008a) including three recently completed trials with longer term follow-up in patients with head and neck cancer (Henke et al, 2003), patients with metastatic breast cancer (Aapro et al, 2008b) and patients with cervical cancer (Strauss et al, 2008). The results of this metaanalysis based on individual patient level data showed no statistically significant difference between patients receiving epoetin-b or control (standard treatment) in terms of overall survival, a favourable trend with respect to the risk of disease progression for patients receiving epoetin-b and a higher risk of thromboembolic events associated with epoetin-b treatment (Aapro et al, 2008a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%