2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of oenological practices on microbial populations using culture-independent techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be underlined that the identification of selected native Inzolia isolates revealed that, although the main percentage of high SO 2 -tolerant yeasts was identified as S. cerevisiae, some nonSaccharomyces species exhibited this characteristic. These results confirm the data of several quantitative ecological studies, which reported that, although the population size of non-Saccharomyces species is reduced throughout the wine fermentations, their growth was not completely suppressed, either in spontaneous or in inoculated fermentations (Hierro et al 2007;Andorrà et al 2008). In our research, besides species frequently reported at the final step of fermentation, as a consequence of high ethanol and sulphur dioxide tolerances, such as Z. bailii, P. anomala, S'codes ludwigii, K. thermotolerans, we found also an isolate of H. uvarum, a species widely considered low-tolerant to these compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It must be underlined that the identification of selected native Inzolia isolates revealed that, although the main percentage of high SO 2 -tolerant yeasts was identified as S. cerevisiae, some nonSaccharomyces species exhibited this characteristic. These results confirm the data of several quantitative ecological studies, which reported that, although the population size of non-Saccharomyces species is reduced throughout the wine fermentations, their growth was not completely suppressed, either in spontaneous or in inoculated fermentations (Hierro et al 2007;Andorrà et al 2008). In our research, besides species frequently reported at the final step of fermentation, as a consequence of high ethanol and sulphur dioxide tolerances, such as Z. bailii, P. anomala, S'codes ludwigii, K. thermotolerans, we found also an isolate of H. uvarum, a species widely considered low-tolerant to these compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The examples of such molecular-based methods are: Intergenic transcribed spacer-polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism (ITS-PCR/RFLP) (Glover et al, 2005;Sawadogo-Lingani et al, 2010), real-time PCR assay (Karns et al, 2005), quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Andorrá et al, 2008), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (Díez et al, 2001;Temmerman et al, 2004;Stringini et al, 2009 ) functions. Due to the nature and origin of traditional beer, its processing is prone to microbial contamination through various routes.…”
Section: Micro-organisms Associated With Indigenous Beermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation supports the hypothesis of the presence of viable but not culturable cells, that are not able to form colonies on agar medium, but are metabolically active during the fermentation. More recently, Andorrà et al (2008Andorrà et al ( , 2009) also studied the effect of SO 2 and temperature on microbial dynamics during wine fermentations. In both cases they demonstrated a good applicability of PCR-DGGE when yeast populations were present with similar counts.…”
Section: Yeast Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andorrà et al (2008) monitored LAB and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) dynamics during wine fermentation as affected by SO 2 . While LAB were determined to be present at the threshold DGGE detection level (10 3 -10 4 cfu/ml,) and only one band, belonging to O. oeni, was detected.…”
Section: Bacterial Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%