Nutritional Management of Renal Disease 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-391934-2.00013-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Nutritional Status and Changes in Protein Intake on Renal Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison Between Impaired Kidney Function and Non-Impaired Kidney Function Subgroups in the Anorexia Nervosa Group 0.54 [0.14] mg/dL; P < .001; SCr/BMI: 3.6% [0.8%] vs 2.8% [1.1%]; P < .001; minimal eGFR: 112[18.5] mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs 124[26.5] mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; P < .001).The FT 3 levels, available for fewer patients in the AN group (n = 187), were lower in the IKF Vs non IKF group (mean [SD] 3.5 [0.2] pmol/L vs 4.08[1.2] pmol/L; P = .001). A similar difference was seen for minimal mean (SD) HR (44[11] beats per min vs 56[16] beats per min; P < .001). Length of hospitalization was longer in the IKF group (median 13 [IQR,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] days vs 8 [IQR,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] days; P = .03).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison Between Impaired Kidney Function and Non-Impaired Kidney Function Subgroups in the Anorexia Nervosa Group 0.54 [0.14] mg/dL; P < .001; SCr/BMI: 3.6% [0.8%] vs 2.8% [1.1%]; P < .001; minimal eGFR: 112[18.5] mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs 124[26.5] mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; P < .001).The FT 3 levels, available for fewer patients in the AN group (n = 187), were lower in the IKF Vs non IKF group (mean [SD] 3.5 [0.2] pmol/L vs 4.08[1.2] pmol/L; P = .001). A similar difference was seen for minimal mean (SD) HR (44[11] beats per min vs 56[16] beats per min; P < .001). Length of hospitalization was longer in the IKF group (median 13 [IQR,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] days vs 8 [IQR,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] days; P = .03).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Nutrition plays a substantial role in renal function. 16 While GFR increases with animal protein intake, it decreases in a state of protein-energy malnutrition, as well as sodium and acid excretion and urinary concentrating ability. 17 Healthy patients fed a calorie-deficient diet demonstrate a reduction in creatinine clearance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…70 Both renal blood flow and GFR increase by at least 30% when healthy persons transition from low to high animal protein intake, 70 whereas vegetable protein intake is not associated with changes in renal plasma flow. 71 The elevated GFR or hyperfiltration noted in obese adults is not mediated by protein intake, 72 but high animal protein intake in obese adults may heighten intraglomerular capillary pressure by vasodilating the afferent arteriole. This afferent dilation occurs due to amino acids triggering multiple humoral and local mediators that vasodilate the afferent arteriole.…”
Section: Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This afferent dilation occurs due to amino acids triggering multiple humoral and local mediators that vasodilate the afferent arteriole. 71,[73][74][75] Afferent vasodilatation then impairs the autoregulatory response of afferent arteriole vasoconstriction in the setting of elevated systemic blood pressures. Impairment of this autoregulatory capacity enhances the transmission of elevated systemic pressures to the glomerular capillary.…”
Section: Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%