2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nozzle selection on deposition of thiamethoxam in Actara® spray drift and implications for off-field risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Stainless steel discs were used as sampling devices based on effectiveness demonstrated in multiple prior field trials 4,21–23 . Moreover, the analytical performance (i.e., extraction efficiency and recovery) of mesotrione was previously characterized 21 using these collectors, which also exhibited superior recovery and lower variability relative to filter paper based on comparison using thiamethoxam.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Stainless steel discs were used as sampling devices based on effectiveness demonstrated in multiple prior field trials 4,21–23 . Moreover, the analytical performance (i.e., extraction efficiency and recovery) of mesotrione was previously characterized 21 using these collectors, which also exhibited superior recovery and lower variability relative to filter paper based on comparison using thiamethoxam.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pesticide risk assessment, movement of pesticide particles off‐site via drift is conservatively modeled using regulatory models, e.g., AgDRIFT®, 1,2 often resulting in over‐estimation of potential exposure and correspondingly overstated estimates of potential risks to non‐target species 3,4 . Numerous techniques have been developed in recent decades to characterize spray drift deposition in open fields and wind tunnels 5–8 ; however, no definitive study has compared these techniques concurrently, specifically comparing fluorescent dye predictions versus analytical confirmation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results were based on a single wind monitoring location approximately 328 ft (100 m) from the deposition sampling area which is beyond the recommendations in the ASABE S561.1 guidance. Studies by Brain et al 14 and Perine et al 12 both explicitly evaluated wind speed and direction effects related to spray drift deposition but also used a single weather station as the basis of their analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Field-scale spray drift deposition studies have been conducted as a means to provide data and information related to pesticide spray drift under real-world conditions. Perine et al 12 conducted a field-scale study using a 600 by 400 ft (183 by 122 m) downwind, bare-ground sampling area to evaluate three nozzle types typically associated with an insecticide (thiamethoxam). Wind speeds during spray applications were between 7.0 to 12.0 mph (3.1-5.4 m s −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation