Limsrivilai et al. report on a randomized control trial (RCT) testing the effi cacy of imipramine for treating esophageal hypersensitivity and functional heartburn, the fi rst RCT to test this therapy in this indication. Among 43 functional heartburn and esophageal hypersensitivity patients randomized to treatment with 25 mg qhs imipramine and 40 randomized to matched placebo, the response rates, judged by a 50% reduction in gastroesophageal refl ux disease symptoms, were 37.2% and 37.5%, respectively, with no observed difference between patients with hypersensitivity and those with functional heartburn. On the positive side, imipramine treatment was associated with improvement in quality of life as assessed by total SF-36 score. Although negative at fi rst glance, there are several important lessons from this study: (i) low-dose tricyclic is suffi cient in these patients; (ii) proton pump inhibitors can (and should) be discontinued when they are ineffective; and (iii) distinguishing between functional heartburn and esophageal hypersensitivity is of unclear clinical relevance. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111:225-227; doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016 In this issue of the Journal, Limsrivilai et al.( 1 ) report on a long overdue randomized control trial (RCT) testing the effi cacy of imipramine for treating esophageal hypersensitivity and functional heartburn. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst RCT to test this therapy in this indication, despite it having become the bedrock of expert recommendations for managing this challenging set of patients ( 2 ). Among 43 functional heartburn and esophageal hypersensitivity patients randomized to treatment with 25 mg qhs imipramine and 40 randomized to matched placebo, the response rates, judged by a 50% reduction in gastro esophageal refl ux disease (GERD) symptoms, were 37.2% and 37.5%, respectively, basically, within a rounding error of each other. On the positive side, those treated with imipramine were more likely to experience improvement in quality of life (QOL) as assessed by total SF-36 score. To be sure, a 37% response rate is not bad when treating functional disorders, but is this really all placebo eff ect?Although we tend to dismiss placebo response as simply a confounder in clinical trials, that may not be the best slant on it. Aft er all, if a therapy achieved a 37% response rate in patients who had been poorly responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and they achieved that along with discontinuing the PPI, that is notable. Th is placebo response rate is on the high side of that observed in other GERD trials (PPIs, H 2 receptor antagonists, so on), estimated at about 18%, but within the reported range of 3-47% ( 3 ). Perhaps, some of the placebo benefi t was attributable to dietary and/or lifestyle modifi cations subconsciously adopted in conjunction with participating in a clinical trial or, perhaps, to the comforting eff ects of the concerned engagement by study personnel but, regardless, there is a lesson in this; sometimes, less is more. Th is adage appl...