2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02308-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Nonlinear Deformational Macrojoint on Stress Wave Propagation Through a Double-Scale Discontinuous Rock Mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting Equation (23) into Equation ( 15), the 𝑅 𝑆𝑆 can be obtained, |𝑅 𝑆𝑆 | and 𝛿 can be obtained from the following equations:…”
Section: Total Reflection Of the Sv Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substituting Equation (23) into Equation ( 15), the 𝑅 𝑆𝑆 can be obtained, |𝑅 𝑆𝑆 | and 𝛿 can be obtained from the following equations:…”
Section: Total Reflection Of the Sv Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through combining the DDM with the virtual wave source method (VWSM), Zhu et al 20 conducted a study on the propagation of stress waves in jointed rock masses and derived the reflection and transmission coefficients for a single rock joint described by the DDM. 21 By combining DDM and split three characteristic lines method, Fan et al 22,23 studied the propagation of stress waves in double scale discontinuous rock masses. These studies indicate that when stress waves propagate to the rock joints, complex transmission and reflection will occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to optimization models, the rules of an inverted seepage field and the accuracy of hydraulic conductivity are greatly affected by mathematical seepage models [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Currently, the most widely used seepage model for calculating fractured rock mass is the discontinuous medium seepage model (DMSM) [ 33 ], which ignores the permeability of a rock block so that only seepage occurring in the fracture [ 34 , 35 , 36 ] is close to the actual flow in a fractured rock mass. However, many fracture parameters, such as fracture width, length, and filling condition, are required to establish the model and are challenging to obtain through geological exploration, leading to a low application in engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, extensive research has been done to investigate wave propagation in fractured rocks based on theoretical analysis (Schoenberg 1980 ; Hudson 1981 ; Crampin 1984 ; Pyrak-Nolte and Cook 1987 ; Shapiro and Kneib 1993 ; Pyrak-Nolte and Nolte 1995 ; Zhao and Cai 2001 ; Perino et al 2010 ; Li 2013 ; Li et al 2014 , 2015 ; Fan et al 2018 , 2021 ), laboratory experiments (Pyrak-Nolte et al 1990 ; Pyrak-Nolte 1996 ; Huang et al 2014 ; Chen et al 2015 , 2016 ; Zhu et al 2015 ; Liu et al 2017 ; Li et al 2017 , 2019 ; Modiriasari et al 2020 ), and numerical simulations (Vlastos et al 2003 , 2007 ; Wang et al 2006 , 2022 ; Deng et al 2012 ; Fan et al 2013 ; Fu et al 2015 ; Yousef and Angus 2016 ; Chen et al 2019 ; Zhu et al 2020 ; Lei and Sornette 2021a , b ; Yang et al 2021 ; Sawayama et al 2022 ). The elementary scenario for studying wave propagation in fractured rock is the transmission of wave energy across a single fracture, which is controlled by the fracture stiffness, wave frequency, and matrix properties (Schoenberg 1980 ; Pyrak-Nolte et al 1990 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%