2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03685-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of non-absorbent intravaginal menstrual/contraceptive products on Staphylococcus aureus and production of the superantigen TSST-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, both the Tampax Cup and the Other Cup showed significantly lower TSST-1 concentrations than the medium control and the currently marketed competitor tampon control. 57 These data support the conclusion that the Tampax Menstrual Cup did not increase the growth of S. aureus and TSST-1 toxin production in vitro when compared to currently marketed products.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, both the Tampax Cup and the Other Cup showed significantly lower TSST-1 concentrations than the medium control and the currently marketed competitor tampon control. 57 These data support the conclusion that the Tampax Menstrual Cup did not increase the growth of S. aureus and TSST-1 toxin production in vitro when compared to currently marketed products.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The applied methodology follows that originally described by Schlievert and Blomster, 56 with further details on its application to assess intravaginal menstrual and contraceptive products provided by Schlievert. 57 In brief, the method includes exposing the test article to cultures of 10 7 S. aureus /mL of Todd Hewitt broth. After 18 h, the supernatants, which will contain any TSST-1 produced, are collected and serially diluted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three previous in vitro studies have compared bacterial growth in menstrual products [21][22][23]. Nonfoux et al suggested that menstrual cups could have a similar risk as tampons in causing mTSS, based on a laboratory experiment of S. aureus growth and TSST-1 production using the tampon sac method [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the Nonfoux et al study does not fully quantitate the impact of menstrual cups on S. aureus growth and TSST-1 production in comparison to tampons. Schlievert performed a similar analysis of S. aureus growth with three methods: stationary incubation, incubation with shaking, or the tampon sac method (designed to mimic the vagina) [23]. In the tampon sac method, a bag (dialysis tubing) containing the period product was filled with growth medium and an S. aureus inoculum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pH 6.5–7.0), a condition which is frequently reported in diseased-state vagina [ 135 ]. Multiple studies have shown that usage of menstrual cups, tampons, and contraceptive diaphragms can disrupt Lactobacillus -dominated vaginal microbiota and enhance the growth of S. aureus and production of TSST-1 [ 136 138 ]. The over-production of TSST-1 can lead to severe complications such as organ failure, systemic inflammation, and death in women [ 139 ].…”
Section: Indigenous Vaginal Microbiota In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%