Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of “Noisy” sun conditions on aircrew radiation exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the anisotropy of arrival and the spectra of these galactic cosmic rays means that locations not very different geographically and with similar cutoffs can have dramatically different dosage rates during the rise and peak of the events. This is probably the biggest departure from the models, as Forbush decreases reduce dose and geomagnetic cutoff variations cause sufficiently small changes as to be less than the accuracy of the measurements and models Lewis et al, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the anisotropy of arrival and the spectra of these galactic cosmic rays means that locations not very different geographically and with similar cutoffs can have dramatically different dosage rates during the rise and peak of the events. This is probably the biggest departure from the models, as Forbush decreases reduce dose and geomagnetic cutoff variations cause sufficiently small changes as to be less than the accuracy of the measurements and models Lewis et al, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, various research groups have measured the galactic cosmic radiation on jet aircraft and balloons and have also theoretically or semiempirically modeled the radiation at altitude [Lewis et al, 2009]. Efforts to determine the additional exposure from solar particle events are also underway [Lewis et al, 2002;Takada et al, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the anisotropy of arrival and the spectra of these galactic cosmic rays means that locations not very different geographically and with similar cutoffs can have dramatically different dosage rates during the rise and peak of the events. This is probably the biggest departure from the models, as Forbush decreases reduce dose and geomagnetic cutoff variations cause sufficiently small changes as to be less than the accuracy of the measurements and models [ Getley et al , 2005; Lewis et al , 2009].…”
Section: Onboard Versus Ground‐based Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These documents are consistent, setting the intervention level at 6 millisieverts per year (mSv yr −1 ) and allowing predictive codes, supported by periodic monitoring, to be used in lieu of personal or aircraft dosimetry. Subsequently, various research groups have measured the galactic cosmic radiation on jet aircraft and balloons and have also theoretically or semiempirically modeled the radiation at altitude [ Lewis et al , 2009]. Efforts to determine the additional exposure from solar particle events are also underway [ Lewis et al , 2002; Bennett et al , 2005; Takada et al , 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These documents are consistent, setting the intervention level at 6 millisieverts per year (mSv yr À1 ) and allowing predictive codes, supported by periodic monitoring, to be used in lieu of personal or aircraft dosimetry. Subsequently, various research groups have measured the galactic cosmic radiation on jet aircraft and balloons and have also theo-retically or semiempirically modeled the radiation at altitude [Lewis et al, 2009]. Efforts to determine the additional exposure from solar particle events are also underway [Lewis et al, 2002;Bennett et al, 2005;Takada et al, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%