2018
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of noise on MTF calculations using different phantoms

Abstract: The uncertainties in the MTF calculation with the edge technique are larger than with the bar technique, and the differences increase with the frequency. On the one hand, the stronger dependency on the frequency shown by the standard deviation of the MTF makes the precision gets worse faster in the edge technique. On the other hand, in the case of the edge and for high levels of noise, differentiation produces line spread functions (LSF) with a poor SNR, increasing erroneously the MTF and worsening accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, the noise in the body PMMA phantom is greater (about 6.5‐fold) than that in the head PMMA phantom at the same exposure factor (mAs and kVp), while the CT number in the head PMMA phantom (about 117 HU) is smaller than that in the body PMMA phantom (about 127 HU). Higher noise causes correspondingly higher MTF fluctuations, resulting in an increase in the standard deviation of the measured MTF …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, the noise in the body PMMA phantom is greater (about 6.5‐fold) than that in the head PMMA phantom at the same exposure factor (mAs and kVp), while the CT number in the head PMMA phantom (about 117 HU) is smaller than that in the body PMMA phantom (about 127 HU). Higher noise causes correspondingly higher MTF fluctuations, resulting in an increase in the standard deviation of the measured MTF …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy is distributed between a discrete set of frequencies and not on a continuous set and the SNR of the MTF decays more slowly with frequency than in the case of the edge. 21 The star-bar pattern presented in this work is built in stainless steel, which limits its best performance to low beam qualities like RQA 3, RQA 5 or x-ray beams used for mammography. The reason for this limit is that steel has a much lower attenuation coefficient than tungsten, material used in the edge phantom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty in the MTF determination with star-bar phantoms has been previously studied. 21,22 In these works, theoretical expressions were derived for the MTF standard deviation for several phantoms. In, 22 the squared-SNR of the MTF was expressed as a function of frequency f for five different phantoms as…”
Section: B Predicted and Measured Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations