Effect of node density on performances of three MANET routing protocols

Adam, Nadir; Ismail, M. Y.; Abdullah, Jiwa

doi:10.1109/icedsa.2010.5503051

Cited by 28 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To evaluate the performance of routing protocols four parameters to calculate different matrices as per the literature review [16], [4], [5] and [20] are evaluated. These are Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), End to End Delay (Davg), Routing Load, and Throughput.…”

Section: Performance Evaluation Of Letsrp and Aodv Routing Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

LETSRP: A Secure Routing Protocol for Manets

Singh¹,

Rohil²,

Rishi³

et al. 2019

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliable link between the nodes playsvital role during the transmission of data in the routing protocols of Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs). In this research paper, a routing protocol Link named Expiration Time based Routing Protocol (LETSRP)is proposed which uses Winternitz One-time Signature Scheme to checkthe authentication of transmitted data in the network. The packet sending node calculates maximum LET (MaxLET), minimum LET (MinLET) and average LET (AvgLET) using greedy algorithm in our proposed solution. The number of sent packets dependson the available bandwidth. Various steps in implementation are repeated until all the packets reach the destination node. Simulations are done with variable number of nodes between10-20 nodes with mobility setting from 10 m/s to 20 m/s.

show abstract

Section: Performance Evaluation Of Letsrp and Aodv Routing Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

LETSRP: A Secure Routing Protocol for Manets

Singh¹,

Rohil²,

Rishi³

et al. 2019

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The mobility model we have chosen is Random Way Point model [4,6,7]. The other parameters that we have chosen for the network in the simulator are as listed below in the TABLE I.…”

Section: Simulation Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pause time in MANET corresponds to the period of time for which a node halts at an intermediate node before moving to destination point [3,4,6,7]. Indirectly this indicates the mobility feature of a node.…”

Section: Variation In Pause Timementioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of effect of mobility on performance of AODV in Mobile Ad hoc Network

Das

Panda

Sahu³

2012

2012 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years the rapid development in telecommunication technologies leads to a non linear growth in the number of users of mobile electronic gadgets accessible to a communication network. These electronic gadgets are nothing but the nodes of the MANET (Mobile Ad hoc Networks) and thus the mobility of the nodes effects a much the performance of the network. A change in mobility can be meant as the change in speed of node during motion in the network or pause time at different points during its motion between a source and destination point in the network. Due to change in mobility link between neighbor nodes can break a number of times as a result of which the performance of a network may be hampered. Also a number of packets may be dropped at different layers of the network. One of the ways of analyzing the performance of a MANET is by considering the packet delivery fraction. This paper describes a detailed analysis of performance affected due to change in mobility. The parameters describing the reason of variation in performance are number of link breaks and number of packet drops.

show abstract

“…The communication overhead is reduced at the expense of delay as a route is to be discovered. Reference [4] In Adhoc environment battery power is conserved both by not sending the advertisements and by not receiving so reactive routing protocols are considered to be very significant. All nodes maintain the record of discovered routes in their routing tables.…”

Section: A Reactive Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols in MANETs

Ubhi¹,

Kaur²

2015

JACN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Mobile wireless Ad Hoc networks (MANET) is an infrastructure free network, where every node functions as transmitter, router and data sink. Mobility and node density are the fundamental characteristics which differentiate MANET from other wireless or wired networks. Therefore, MANET routing protocols are designed to adaptively cater to dynamic changes in topology while maximizing the throughput and packet delivery ratio, and minimizing delay, aggregate good put, average jitter and minimum packet loss. In this paper, Ad Hoc Demand Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) are used to implement the MANET which have been simulated on QualNet5.0 simulator. The impact on mobility and change in node density factor in MANET is investigated and compared for reactive routing protocols such as AODV and DSR. The simulative study on MANET routing protocols aims to determine the performance of current MANET routing protocols with respect to mobility and node density factors. Results vary when we change the node density. It is observed that an increase in node density has different impact on all routing protocols under various mobility patterns, i.e. a degradation of the network performance. However, the degree of degradation varies for different combinations of protocols. The performance of RWP model provides a baseline to judge the quality of routing protocols when there is no group movement. The results of this network are tabulated along with a comprehensive analysis which compares throughput, packet delivery ratio, end to end delay, aggregate good put, average jitter value and packet dropping.Index Terms-MANET, QualNet5.0, AODV, DSR.

show abstract

Effect of node density on performances of three MANET routing protocols

Cited by 28 publications

References 2 publications

LETSRP: A Secure Routing Protocol for Manets

LETSRP: A Secure Routing Protocol for Manets

Analysis of effect of mobility on performance of AODV in Mobile Ad hoc Network

Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols in MANETs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About