2016
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of No‐Till Practice on Runoff and Nonpoint Source Pollution from an Intensively Farmed Field in Korea

Abstract: A 2‐year runoff plot study was conducted under simulated rainfall to explore the effects of no‐till (NT) practice on the runoff ratio and NPS pollution in an intensive farming region of Korea. Eight 5 × 30 m runoff plots, four each on 3 and 8% slopes, were prepared in existing loamy sand fields. Cultivation in two plots on each slope followed conventional practice (CT). Six rainfall simulations were conducted during the study, each of a nominal 1 h duration and 30 mm h‐1 intensity. The runoff ratio of the NT p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conservation tillage practices aimed at decreasing sediment‐bound P losses from agriculture have been widely adopted (Dodd and Sharpley, 2016), the effects of different tillage approaches on P losses are inconsistent. A number of studies have evaluated the effects of tillage on P losses, with most research demonstrating that conservation tillage reduces P losses in surface runoff relative to conventional tillage due to lower soil erosion rates (McDowell and McGregor, 1984; Andraski et al, 1985; Seta et al, 1993; Gaynor and Findlay, 1995; Puustinen et al, 2005; He et al, 2006; Franklin et al, 2007; Ulén et al, 2010; Coelho et al, 2012; Choi et al, 2016; Cherobim et al, 2017). Other studies have found that conservation tillage decreases runoff volume compared with conventional tillage, which can be an important factor in reducing P losses, as runoff volumes can heavily influence cumulative P loads, even when P concentrations are low (Blevins et al, 1990; Seta et al, 1993; Maetens et al, 2012; Smith and Warnemuende‐Pappas, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conservation tillage practices aimed at decreasing sediment‐bound P losses from agriculture have been widely adopted (Dodd and Sharpley, 2016), the effects of different tillage approaches on P losses are inconsistent. A number of studies have evaluated the effects of tillage on P losses, with most research demonstrating that conservation tillage reduces P losses in surface runoff relative to conventional tillage due to lower soil erosion rates (McDowell and McGregor, 1984; Andraski et al, 1985; Seta et al, 1993; Gaynor and Findlay, 1995; Puustinen et al, 2005; He et al, 2006; Franklin et al, 2007; Ulén et al, 2010; Coelho et al, 2012; Choi et al, 2016; Cherobim et al, 2017). Other studies have found that conservation tillage decreases runoff volume compared with conventional tillage, which can be an important factor in reducing P losses, as runoff volumes can heavily influence cumulative P loads, even when P concentrations are low (Blevins et al, 1990; Seta et al, 1993; Maetens et al, 2012; Smith and Warnemuende‐Pappas, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…강우에 따른 밭 토양 유실과 비점오염물질 유출은 연 중 발생할 수 있으나, 밭작물의 2~3모작을 고려할 때, 특히 토 양이 일정기간 나지상태로 노출되는 작기(전작물과 후작물 재 배의 사이)의 토양유실과 오염물질 유출 위험성이 증대될 수 있다. 이 간작기는 인공습지⋅침사지 등 일부를 제외한 대다 수의 구조적⋅비구조적 최적관리기법 (Choi et al, 2016;Jang et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2015;Shin et al, 2013;Shin et al, 2012)의 적용이 곤란한 시기이다. 따라서 대부분의 농경 지는 다음 작물재배 시기까지 방치된 상태로 경과하게 된다.…”
Section: Research Article-soil Environmentunclassified
“…Soil erosion and nutrient loss studies using runoff plots have been more effectively utilized in China, the United States and Europe [20][21][22]. Runoff plots were used to explore the effects of no-till practices on reducing agricultural nonpoint source pollution [23] and the effects of variable versus uniform fertilizer application on nutrient loss [24]. The variables in runoff plots are easier to control than in small watersheds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%