1996
DOI: 10.1128/iai.64.1.69-76.1996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nitric oxide on staphylococcal killing and interactive effect with superoxide

Abstract: The role of reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) such as nitric oxide ( . NO) in host defense against pyogenic microorganisms is unclear, and the actual interactive effect of RNI and reactive oxidative intermediates (ROI) for microbial killing has not been determined. Since, in nature, ROI and RNI might be generated together within any local infection, we evaluated the separate and interactive effects of . NO and O 2 ؊ on staphylococcal survival by using a simplified system devoid of eukaryotic cells. These s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They also provided evidence that nitrite-derived NO played a role in the inhibition of biofilm formation and that biofilm-embedded staphylococci could be efficiently killed by nitrite in an acidic environment. Despite NO exposure being able to reduce staphylococcal viability (Kaplan et al, 1996), S. aureus has been described as being relatively resistant to growth inhibition by NO, principally by the observation of efficient NO scavenging mechanisms, where flavohemoprotein Hmp was shown to play a crucial role in counteracting NO toxicity (Richardson et al, 2006). In this study, we observed that oxidative and nitrosative stress could be produced inside biofilms, thereby affecting their growth under different conditions and resulting in ROS and RNI production, with a decrease of the extracellular matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also provided evidence that nitrite-derived NO played a role in the inhibition of biofilm formation and that biofilm-embedded staphylococci could be efficiently killed by nitrite in an acidic environment. Despite NO exposure being able to reduce staphylococcal viability (Kaplan et al, 1996), S. aureus has been described as being relatively resistant to growth inhibition by NO, principally by the observation of efficient NO scavenging mechanisms, where flavohemoprotein Hmp was shown to play a crucial role in counteracting NO toxicity (Richardson et al, 2006). In this study, we observed that oxidative and nitrosative stress could be produced inside biofilms, thereby affecting their growth under different conditions and resulting in ROS and RNI production, with a decrease of the extracellular matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this harmful effect of NO, it also has host protective effects. NO may play a role in neutrophilmediated tumor cytostasis [16] or may act as a backup antimicrobial system [13,14]. We have recently shown that NO can be an important candidacidal agent in rat PMN [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the role of NO produced by leukocytes, it has been extensively reported that this molecule participates in the killing activity against different pathogens [13,14]. We recently demonstrated that NO is involved in the candidacidal activity of rat inflammatory peritoneal neutrophils [15] and other authors have shown that NO contributes to the tumoricidal activity of those cells [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Other bacterial pathogens such as Staphylococcus exhibit a different response to redox-mediated attack. The simultaneous presence of NO and peroxide in staphylococcal infections leads to a protective effect, where NO reduces ROS-mediated toxicity to the bacteria [60]. Yet, when Staphylococcus bacteria are exposed first to peroxide followed by NO, increased toxicity is observed [60].…”
Section: Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simultaneous presence of NO and peroxide in staphylococcal infections leads to a protective effect, where NO reduces ROS-mediated toxicity to the bacteria [60]. Yet, when Staphylococcus bacteria are exposed first to peroxide followed by NO, increased toxicity is observed [60]. In this case, it is the sequential exposure to a burst of superoxide/ROS production followed by NO that is critical for the maximum killing effect by these redox molecules.…”
Section: Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%