Effect of nicosulfuron on plant traits of Xanthium strumarium

Božić, Dragana; Sarić-Krsmanović, Marija; Pavlović, Danijela; Vrbničanin, Sava

doi:10.1007/bf03356480

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, Lueschen et al (1992) and Dogan et al (2005) showed that many broadleaf weeds, including X. strumarium could not be controlled satisfactory with nicosulfuron. Nevertheless, Bozic et al (2013) showed that nicosulfuron could have a major impact on X. strumarium production, reducing growth and competitiveness, as well as, bur production and the seed bank of X. strumarium in the soil. The repeated use of the same herbicide or herbicides with the same mode of action during several consecutive years for the control of susceptible weed species leads to development of resistant populations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Response to Nicosulfuron

Božić

Barać

Sarić-Krsmanović

et al. 2015

Not Bot Horti Agrobo

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response of two populations (CC1, 43.59Â°N & 20.40Â°E; CC2, 44.46Â°N & 20.17Â°E) of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) to nicosulfuron was investigated both in field experiments and in the laboratory. Population CC1 had no history of treatment with any herbicide, while population CC2 was treated with ALS inhibitor herbicides for six consecutive years. In the field, plants were treated post-emergence with nicosulfuron (0, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 g ai ha-1) at four true leaves. Visual injury estimation and vegetative parameters (plant height, fresh weight, leaf area) were recorded about month after herbicide application. The acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme activity in response to herbicide concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 μM was determined in vitro. GR50 values for vegetative parameters and I50 values for ALS activity were slightly greater for the CC2 than for the CC1population, but the results confirmed that neither population was susceptible to nicosulfuron. Namely, based on results for fresh weight, the population CC1 was about 3.9 and 2.6-fold more susceptible to nicosulfuron than population CC2 in two consecutive years, but differences were not so prominent for other parameters (plant height, leaf area and ALS activity), ranging from 1.18 to 1.8-fold. The differences between population CC1 and CC2 could be attributed to inter-population variability in susceptibility to nicosulfuron or could be the consequence of repeated application of ALS herbicides to the CC2 population during the six previous years. Future investigations are necessary in order to clarify this dilemma.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Response to Nicosulfuron

Božić

Barać

Sarić-Krsmanović

et al. 2015

Not Bot Horti Agrobo

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, herbicides do not directly affect plant reproduction, but some of them affect the generative production of surviving weeds. For example, nicosulfuron significantly reduced the weight and number of burs of X. strumarium (Bozic et al, 2013), as well as the head and seed production of weedy sunflower (Bozic et al, 2016). Also, bentazone reduced the weight of burs of X. strumarium (Zhang et al, 1994).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although, broadleaf species like Amaranthus retroflexus and Polygonum pensylvanicum are extremely susceptible to nicosulfuron (Kapusta et al, 1994), many other species, including Chenopodium album, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Abutilon theophrasti, Xanthium strumarium and Solanum ptycanthum, are not susceptible (Lueschen et al, 1992). Nicosulfuron applied at the seedling stage does not directly affect plant reproduction but it affects plant traits such as height, fresh weight, leaf area and burs production in annual weeds like X. strumarium (Bozic et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Effects of different weed species on crop productivity and yield loss have been studied by many researchers (Arslan et al, 2006;Karimmojeni et al, 2010;Zafar et al, 2010), but few studies have investigated effects of different factors on weed biological production (Conley et al, 2002;Vrbnicanin et al, 2006Vrbnicanin et al, , 2017Onć-Jovanović et al, 2011;Bozic et al, 2013Bozic et al, , 2016. Generally, the influence of factors such as time of weed emergence, crop density or illumination on weed biomass and seed production have been studied frequently (Benvenuti et al, 1994;Conley et al, 2002;Teasdale & Cavigelli, 2010), while studies on the influence of herbicides on biological production have been rarer (Vrbnicanin et al, 2006;Bozic et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of nicosulfuron on biological production of weedy sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field experiments were conducted to quantify the effects of nicosulfuron on biological production of weedy sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Plants of this weed species were sown in plots sized 5x4.2 m with inter-row spacing of 24 cm, and 70 cm distance between rows. Plants with two pairs of developed leaves were treated with nicosulfuron using the next rates: 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 g a.i. ha-1. Vegetative parameters (plant height, fresh weight and leaf area) were recorded five times during vegetation, including the first measurement just before herbicide application and four measurements at intervals of about two weeks. Head and seed production (number of heads per plant, head weight, head diameter, weight of seeds per head, weight of seeds per plant, number of seeds per plant) were determined after seed maturity. The application of nicosulfuron caused growth reduction of weedy sunflower in comparison with the control. All application rates of this herbicide reduced vegetative (height, fresh weight, leaf area) and some generative (number of heads per plant, weight of seeds per plant, number of seeds per plant) parameters, which decreased with increasing rates of nicosulfuron. Effects on the remaining generative test parameters (head weight, head diameter, weight of seeds per head) were not analogous to the effects on other parameters. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III46008]

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Response to Nicosulfuron

Božić

Barać

SARIC-KRSMANOVIC

et al. 2015

Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response of two populations (CC1, 43. 59°N & 20.40°E; CC2, 44.46°N & 20.17°E) of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) to nicosulfuron was investigated both in field experiments and in the laboratory. Population CC1 had no history of treatment with any herbicide, while population CC2 was treated with ALS inhibitor herbicides for six consecutive years. In the field, plants were treated post-emergence with nicosulfuron (0, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 g ai ha -1 ) at four true leaves. Visual injury estimation and vegetative parameters (plant height, fresh weight, leaf area) were recorded about month after herbicide application. The acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme activity in response to herbicide concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µM was determined in vitro. GR50 values for vegetative parameters and I50 values for ALS activity were slightly greater for the CC2 than for the CC1 population, but the results confirmed that neither population was susceptible to nicosulfuron. Namely, based on results for fresh weight, the population CC1 was about 3.9 and 2.6-fold more susceptible to nicosulfuron than population CC2 in two consecutive years, but differences were not so prominent for other parameters (plant height, leaf area and ALS activity), ranging from 1.18 to 1.8-fold. The differences between population CC1 and CC2 could be attributed to inter-population variability in susceptibility to nicosulfuron or could be the consequence of repeated application of ALS herbicides to the CC2 population during the six previous years. Future investigations are necessary in order to clarify this dilemma.

show abstract

Effect of nicosulfuron on plant traits of Xanthium strumarium

Cited by 5 publications

References 16 publications

Common Cocklebur (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>) Response to Nicosulfuron

Common Cocklebur (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>) Response to Nicosulfuron

Effects of nicosulfuron on biological production of weedy sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Common Cocklebur (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>) Response to Nicosulfuron

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About