2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2012.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of neutral pressure on the He plasma flow measurement in a linear device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 50000 particles were traced until almost all the particles disappeared, and the density profiles were obtained by accumulating the positions of particles until they disappeared. There exists a plasma flow from the upstream to downstream at least for ions in NAGDIS-II as was measured previously [28]. The range of the Mach number was 0.1-0.6 in the central region; when increasing the gas pressure, the flow decreased and the flow reversal occurred in the peripheral region.…”
Section: B Modelingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…About 50000 particles were traced until almost all the particles disappeared, and the density profiles were obtained by accumulating the positions of particles until they disappeared. There exists a plasma flow from the upstream to downstream at least for ions in NAGDIS-II as was measured previously [28]. The range of the Mach number was 0.1-0.6 in the central region; when increasing the gas pressure, the flow decreased and the flow reversal occurred in the peripheral region.…”
Section: B Modelingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…19 In addition, plasma flow was also measured by varying the neutral gas pressure, P, in a range of 2-35 mTorr in NAGDIS-II. 20 The flow reversal in the axial direction was observed in the edge region when the neutral pressure was high (35 mTorr). The mechanism of reverse plasma flow is not fully understood yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration factor does not seem to be a constant parameter at 40 < < 130 and highly dependent on the collision parameters. In addition, the calculated calibration factor for collisional plasma conditions is much higher than that for collisionless models [ 15 ], which have similar results for the overestimation of plasma flow velocity in collisional plasmas by an MP [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Using the 2D simulation results of at the center of the z-axis with pressure variation, as shown in Figure 6 , the calibration factor was calculated using Equation (10) as . Figure 7 shows the results for the relation between the calibration factor and normalized ionization collision frequency ( ) as a dimensionless parameter to deduce the effect of the collision parameter on the calibration factor, where and are the ionization collision frequency and the probe radius [ 15 , 23 , 24 ]. The calibration factor does not seem to be a constant parameter at 40 < < 130 and highly dependent on the collision parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation