2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of neuraxial technique after inadvertent dural puncture on obstetric outcomes and anesthetic complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this meta-analysis included nine reports, among them, three were abstracts of a conference, and they were not published at full length. Since the last meta-analysis was performed, several relevant studies have been published [1, 3, 8, 13, 14, 18]. Most interestingly, Verstraete et al [8] and Kaddoum et al [13] both reported that the application of intrathecal catheter following ADP reduced the risk of PDPH in obstetric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this meta-analysis included nine reports, among them, three were abstracts of a conference, and they were not published at full length. Since the last meta-analysis was performed, several relevant studies have been published [1, 3, 8, 13, 14, 18]. Most interestingly, Verstraete et al [8] and Kaddoum et al [13] both reported that the application of intrathecal catheter following ADP reduced the risk of PDPH in obstetric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies are retrospective and focused mainly on the managements of accidental dural puncture with the intrathecal catheters compared to repeat epidural catheters [11,18,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][38][39][40]. In most of these analgesia was established with a lower dose local anaesthetist (bupivacaine 1.25-5 mg or ropivacaine 1.75-10 mg) combined with either fentanyl 12.5-25 mcg or sufentanil 2-7.5 mc; and maintained commonly with continuous infusion of low concentration local anaesthetist with opioid either bupivacaine 0.04-0.1% or ropivacaine 0.1-0.2% with either fentanyl 2-2.5 mcg/ ml or sufentanil 0.75-1.0 mcg/ml at a rate of 1-3 ml per hour [11,18,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]39], whereas, only few studies has used intermittent bolus or patient controlled analgesia [29,34,41]. Some authors suggest to use 10% of the epidural dose for both intrathecal bolus and continous infusion [41].…”
Section: Prevention Of Inadvertent or Unintended Dural Puncturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the surgical anaesthesia is and risk of repeat dural puncture [25]. Several studies claim that intrathecal catheter after accidental dural puncture reduces both the incidence and severity of PDPH, however, the evidence is conflicting as most data come from retrospective studies and proper well design randomised clinical trials are lacking [8,19,25,26,[27][28][29][30][31][32]. There are some drawbacks and potential risks of intrathecal catheters such as accidental medication error, risk of infection or injury to the spinal cord or nerve roots [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Anaesthesia For Caesarean Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations